Due to low intelligence!
What? Surely the next Congress can pick up where this one leaves off. Doesn’t Gaetz have any faith in the system?
Republican Master Gaetz on Fox.
Frankly, I agree with his assessment of congressional oversight. It’s been shockingly lax with regard to the criminal in the White House.
Oh, the pace is going to pickup alright, in about a month.
But only once a month, now that he’s made it through the 5-cereal initiation to become a Proud Boy.
“I don’t think that we really wanted the answers to a lot of these questions,” Gaetz said.
Go ask any gop member about low energy, do nothing grifting of the Taxpayer.
You will get the same answer every time.
We keep getting our asses burned for trying to have crap stick to the wall,
but most important,
“We be afraid of being put through a tweet storm if we can’t find the answers we want to hear”.
There’s that anyway.
'Low-Energy Oversight'
More like the ’ high-energy ’ opposite ……of oversight —
To Rep. Gaetz: Please go away little man.
Matt Gaetz is Marco Rubio 2.0 and equally phony and attention starved.
Don’t worry, Gaetz, the new incoming Democratic led House should be calling you in for an interview along with all your Florida comrades.
One man’s low energy oversight is another’s high intensity cover up. Guess which side you’re on dumb ass.
wish you wouldn’t steal my stuff ……
already having a terrible time keeping @irasdad out of it —
Somebody get this yapping lap dog one of those electrozapper collars.
“I don’t think that we really wanted the answers to a lot of these questions,”
Quite the contrary,I think Ryan and Gowdy know what the answers are…that the “deep state” is a figment of rightwing imagination and those inquiries would lead to Republican,not Democratic,misdeeds.
“This low-energy oversight is one of the reasons I think we lost the majority,” he added.
“I think that a lot of the Republican leadership viewed the Russian investigation and our oversight into the FBI’s conduct as disruptive to the economic message that they were trying to push.”
Well I think you and he disagree on what the answers actually were, but on their unwantedness you’re on the same side. So there’s something we can build on. 