Discussion for article #239212
Of course he didn’t. He doesn’t appreciate when a woman speaks at all.
You have a friend at the Fox News corner of the world, conservatives have a friend, and we friends stick together.
But when there aren’t any Libtards around to bash, we go absolutely medieval on each other, because…well, it’s the only thing we know how to do.
I bet he’s still miffed about Kelly shutting down Rove’s math and throwing the '12 election to Obama.
Poor Todd Starnes is stuck in a world with yucky gross girls. He needs to learn to either live it or live with it
Dude is the motherload of douchebaggery. Can’t stand Starnes. He is an absolute, unadulterated, festering bag of bloody religio-fascist smegma. He’s been at the forefront of pushing the lies and smear against PP based on those edited videos lately. The only smear he deserves to be involved in is a pile of meconium all over his face.
This guy is really a moron, isn’t he?
The abortion thing, for example. What it does is give Walker a chance to get out in front of it and justify it before it can be used against him.
Looks like this guy’s smart glasses are about as effective as Perry’s.
And if he really thinks Kelly wrote most of those questions, he’s probably dumb enough to think that Rynd Paul signs those little pocket Constitutions he sells on his website.
Megyn Kelly: "Would you really let a mother die rather than have an abortion?” Are you freaking kidding me?
Translation: please do not ask questions that demonstrate the truly evil nature of our party’s platform, especially when it disagrees with more than 8 in 10 Americans.
Yes, please stop challenging our beliefs by asking us to defend them.
He was probably OK with asking Mike Dukakis if he’d still oppose the death penalty if his wife were raped and murdered, though.
Starnes------is president of a support group of men who are unabashedly afraid of strong, articulate women.
He wouldn’t say this to her face either, but 140 characters works fine as a way to slime her
He strikes me as a more mushy, pasty version of Sean Hannity . . .
The only thing I learned from this story is that there is an entire media ecosystem on the right which I have no knowledge of its inhabitants. I am constantly stunned by the breadth and depth of the right wing echo chamber.
Questions like these really need to be prohibited. They serve no purpose in a free society, because they can too easily used to enforce political correctness.
In the Walker-Kasich administration, we need this fellow to serve as Assistant to the Chief Censor (the Chief Censor, a cabinet-level position, will of course be occupied by Brent Bozell).
Plus she makes more money than he does, and that is of course totally unfair.
“You have a friend at the Fox News corner of the world, conservatives have a friend, and we friends stick together.”
Except that conservative hussy Kelly. We will just stick a shiv in her back. That’s what friends are for, after all.
Consider the answer to his rhetorical question, which is, “Damn straight we would rather let her die. She is just a woman, and if she can’t get the one thing they are supposed to do, which is give birth, done correctly, that what good is she?”
I think that the question to Trump was not wrong. It was unfair. She should have asked questions of all the candidates that were equally accusatory.
For example, she could have John Bush how much money should be spent on women’s health or whether he supported his father’s decision to create and fund the Taliban and his brother’s decisions to fly Saudi al Qaeda terrorists home. Huckabee could be asked about whether he would use his holocaust analogies when Ronald Raven sent arms to Iran.
About right. I considered those her best moments.
Why is Todd Starnes still a thing?