Discussion: Fox Panel: We Don't Regulate Cars! Why Should We Regulate Guns? (VIDEO)

Only if it’s a competitive tennis racquet.

2 Likes

By Harris’ mind blowing logic, the most basic of all “basics” to take away should be the homes we live in where most deaths by accident occur. As per usual, the nuanced-incapable mind cannot imagine any regulation that does not include elimination of the product.

It is like the Outnumbered panel. While their private conversation undocumented by TV camera would eliminate the risk of contagious stupidity spreading to viewers, TV manufacturers could well solve the problem with the cheap fix of installing personalized technologies to assure one’s TV does not accidentally tune in to the show.

1 Like

@steviedee111, I would give a pass to the 13 year old for just being a 13 year old. The jury is still out on whether a 13 year old is stupid too.

I recall at that age building elementary guns made of a small pipe, stuffed with a BB injected firecracker in the woods behind our house. I’d build battleship models, float them in the brook, and fix the small half inch diameter pipe on the brook’s edge, and sink them with a few targeted shots. Of course, I’d dart behind the nearby tree in case the explosive force turned the metal pipe into a pipe bomb.

Not sure whether this means I was troubled or just curious, maybe both, but I am pretty certain my parents thought it not much different than the miniature Yankee replica wiffle ball stadium complete with feet markers in the same vicinity that my brothers and I built and spent long summer days playing ball in.

Brings a whole new meaning to lighting decor: bright, yellow, blue, off-white… and turd-white.

Derp, at its finest.

1 Like

We also require liability insurance on cars in case use of the car results in injury or death, whether the owner was driving or someone else.
When cars are sold or stolen we track them by VIN.
When cars are used in a crime, they are confiscated.
Cars must have seat belts, shatterproof windows, and hundreds of other safety specifications.
Cars are prohibited in many locations.

So since the Schmuck Dynasty fake hillbilly thinks this is NOT regulation, surely he can’t object to insuring guns, registering them by ID, requiring safety locks, or local ordinances enforcing gun free zones. Oh, and when there’s an “accident” or crime committed by anyone with the gun, it is confiscated.

1 Like

“What is wrong with these people”?

The same thing that afflicts their viewers. I am reminded of the movie Office Space where Peter and blue collar worker Lawrence had this interchange:

Peter Gibbons: That’s it? If you had a million dollars, you’d do two chicks at the same time?
Lawrence: Damn straight. I always wanted to do that, man. And I think if I had a million dollars I could hook that up, cause chicks dig a dude with money.
Peter Gibbons: Well, not all chicks.
Lawrence: Well the kind of chicks that’d double up on a dude like me do.

So the Outnumbered cast is only pandering to the kind of viewers who’d agree with the nonsense they pedal.

Seriously? We don’t regulate cars?

1 Like

I suppose their salaries are measured in inverse proportion to their skirt lengths.

3 Likes

This is not me firing that potato cannon but I did make one very similar to it. My friends and I, when camping, have exploded various items.

Beer can full of various powdered chemicals stuffed into the campfire,

2 gram chunk of metallic lithium dropped into a Pringles can 1/3rd full of water… not a good idea as the can was turned inside out as a result.

None of this is anything anyone should do at home (or camping).

Guns are made to maim and kill. That’s their function. it’s what they are meant to do. No other ordinary everyday tool I can conjure up is meant to instantly kill. But for some reason a lot of people think there’s something sacred about behaving stupidly with them.

1 Like

Yes, the derpitude is self-selecting. The brainless Outnumbered zombies and their audience are a perfect match.

Exactly! The insurance companies would love to get a piece of this.

Imagine if every gun had to be insured - they’d make zillions selling polices. The underwriters could charge higher premiums for those deemed high risk, or even deny policies to repeat offenders or those with pre-existing conditions like mental illness, criminal background or failure to pass the gun safety test.

Free market baby!

3 Likes

And what do you know, I own one of those as well. I’m a complicated woman.

Florida is one state that does not inspect. Last I knew Kansas and Missouri also don’t inspect. California, they inspect weekly (or so it seemed while I lived there).

Who the hell in their right minds listens to these ridiculous brain dead bitches?

2 Likes

Also a big identifying number, perhaps on some kind of plate, that can be read from 20 feet away…

1 Like

There’s no safety inspection in California. There is an emissions inspection every other year, but, if your car is older than I think 1994 you only have to spend $450 to get it in compliance, and if that’s not enough, they still issue the tags…

“Fox Host: We Don’t Regulate Cars! Why Should We Regulate Guns?”

How is it that these FOX people get to say such asinine ridiculous wrong things on TV to millions of people?

How does that happen?

1 Like

When airheads interpret life and death only the technology matters, never the logic.

1 Like

A bunch of old dudes who can’t get it up, but are hoping to spend “quality” time with them.

Or so I have heard.

1 Like