That’s not how you spell “peephole.”
And that’s not how you spell “glory hole”
(o I am going to get in trouble)
Last year I was at a party chatting with someone who was a teacher in the very upscale New Jersey town where the Conways reside. They said some of the kids were so spoiled and annoying “I’ll get my dad after you, he’s a really important person!” They said that it was more gratifying and easier to teach in Newark where the kids were down to earth.
That is an ugly comment. Calling women “b*tches” is not appropriate unless you want to continue to perpetuate degrading sexism and dehumanization of women.
“Smile… or else.”
Was she supposed to call her a female dog?
Well, that didn’t work. Whatever it was, it was nasty.
Hasn’t this already been ad-dressed?
http://static5.uk.businessinsider.com/image/5b2c074542e1cc74fc16c012-480/melani-thumb.jpg
Thoughtful articles have been written about how Melania didn’t really want this job and isn’t a natural hostess or staff director, so deserves some generosity in assessing her as a First Lady. I agree with this.
Kurtz on the other hand is making an idiotic false equivalency argument that’s both factually wrong and wrong in concept. Howie, news flash – different situations are different. (And, your Fox buddies were horrible to Michelle.) Get bent.
It’s absolute bullshit, but even if true…
No previous First Lady had a well documented history of being a porn star and escort. No previous First Lady had lift their predecessors speeches and writings, no previous First Lady has wore a jacked saying “I don’t give a shit” on her way to a children’s concentration camp, and by the way we never heard what her feelings were, I guess she found the camps kosher.
You forgot Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner saying Michelle Obama had a big butt.
I remember when tRump was starting to run (knew nothing about him and had never seen the Apprentice) and heard and saw what Melania did for work, I though no way. A porn star for first lady that just would never happen. I was way wrong.
…or dressed in colonialism attire to visit Africa…
[quote=“losamigos, post:53, topic:82006”]
She has “no business being involved” in what people eat. (New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie)
[/quote]
It’s probably impossible to raise kids whose heads are screwed on right when parents travel in the circles they do, people jumping to attention when they appear, and a sense of self entitlement grabs hold early and stays.
I suppose the below would have worked, but it just doesn’t roll of the tongue (or fingers in this case) as easily.
Me too. I was also utterly sick at the thought of her following Michelle into our house. Just sick. I haven’t really gotten over it.
Oh please …
After years of masquerading as a rather naïve but always well-meaning amateur fuss-budget, Mrs. Eleanor Roosevelt lately has been revealing herself as a cunning and indefatigable conspirator against the rights and independence of the individual American citizen and an active proponent of power-government.
Westbrook Pegler, 1941 Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist
Just for record, any woman who could wear a jacket that says I Don’t Really Care Do You? to tour children’s concentration camps is a bitch as far as I’m concerned. And not the good kind.
gobsmocked.