Discussion for article #232187
Can a lawsuit be launched requiring that Fox remove the word âNewsâ and replace it with âPropaganda and Liesâ.
Now, about everything else you need to apologize for: where to beginâŚ
Fox and Rupert Murdoch should be entitled to their own facts. They should not have to apologize for anything.
As I said before, considering how few apologies are ever given out at FauxNews, someone must have dragged Murdoch over the coals on that one.
Itâll only make them believe it harder.
FoxNews needs to apologize for its very existence.
ââŚerrors on-air regarding the Muslim population in EuropeâŚâ
What the hell is wrong with you, Fox!
Youâve already convinced every white, non-Muslim in the United States that every Muslim American is an enemy. Humiliating 6 million people isnât enough for you? Now youâre pissing them off in Europe??? Europeâs got 9 times the number of Muslims!
Are you trying to get us all killed?
An incredibly effective way to avoid having to do this kind of apology: donât make stupid comments of this type, or at least bracket them with caveats. Fox apology acknowledges that a âguestâ comment reflects on Fox itself.
Iâm first to give it all for free speech, but why donât I have a claim for damages against this stain on the psyche of the country? Fox and its fellow travelers have done far more damage to the body politic than Sarah Palin and Louie Gohmert. Theyâve fulminated sedition, racism and ignorance in the name of the privileged. This release; issued on a Saturday and far short of an apology is just another papering over of the FOX taint.
A Fox apology, especially for a story theyâve made a bid deal of, is pretty extraordinary. They could have just quietly dropped the subject of âno go zonesâ as theyâve done with other bogus issues theyâve hyped. I wonder if Shep Smith might have had something to do with this. He frequently has failed to toe the Fox party line in the past.
Whatâs this? An actual âapologyâ apology from the Flockâs News? Not âweâre sorry if you were offended,â but an actual âweâre sorry we did that.â Dick Nixonâs teeth must be chattering like crazy!
High crime areas? You know who lives in those areas? Thatâs right.
I wonder if Booby ânot ready for prime timeâ Jindal will change any of the speech heâs giving in London Monday?
In Iraq, ISIS commits genocide, enslaves women and beheads opponents.
And in the West, non-assimilationist Muslims establish enclaves and carry out as much of Sharia law as they can without regard for the laws of the democratic countries which provided them a new home.
It is startling to think that any country would allow, even unofficially, for a so called âno-go zone.â
The idea that a free country would allow for specific areas of its country to operate in an autonomous way that is not free and is in direct opposition to its laws is hard to fathom.
http://gov.louisiana.gov/index.cfm?md=newsroom&tmp=detail&articleID=4805
Need to check my sanity this week. First up, Steve King makes sense. Now Fox News apologizes for egregious propaganda?
Seriously. WTF?
Riddle me this: why is Jindal giving a speech in London about anything, much less foreign policy?
Hmmmm. Is there a presidential election next year, by any chance?
Can I have a toke?
It must be the âend timesâ.
I feel a #JindalShambles coming on.
Iâd say thatâs a good possibility, he was probably going to cover it on his show, so they had to get out in front of him.