Yep, around 1991.
What a surprise. A press secretary who doesnât know what he is talking about
I too am surprised when i read it was really 2003.
Invading Iraq seemed to be the very next thing on the agenda on September 12, 2001
Exactly. The start of war (âWhen was that anyway??â) means so little when no child, relative or close friend had to put his/her life on the line. And those 100,00 Iraqis? - meh . .
Should have just stolen cattle feed instead. They let you off for that you know.
It wasâand before that, really.
They just waited for theatrical effect.
I remember it well since I hit the streets with a couple thousand of my close friends in protest just days later.
Oh, come on. The war process was well underway in 2002 and he was inside the building, living it. This is a trivial error.
No, Ari. 2002 was the year that the GOP re-took the Senate, giving Cheney permission to ignore deficits. âReagan proved that deficits donât matter. This is our due.â
The war started the next year and wasnât expected to last more than 3 months and was expected to pay for itself with the liberated oil revenue.
He canât be expected to remember that. He had a lot to do after being replaced by the bubblehead Dana Perino.
Trying to keep up with all those lies is bound to cause confusion. Poor Ari.
So true! I was at a conference in November 2002. Ended up at a table with business professors from some Texas university (I donât remember which one). One guy at the table was a big shot in National Guard and had been called up so would not be teaching in the Spring semester. He said the war was on. When I countered that Bush said he had not decided, he laughed and said âWeâre going to take his oil.â In fact, numerous times throughout the evening he said, âWeâre going to take his oil.â On the walk back to our hotel, my wife and I would burst out âWeâre going to take his oilâ and laugh. Not laughing that the dead folks we knew were coming but at the jackass business professor who was so âhappyâ he was going to war.
Yeah, that old will they/wonât they thing worked so well on Friends, why wouldnât it work if foreign policy?
bush boys broke it and they blame Obama for not fixing it. jsfox says it so succinctly.
So he is arguing that his former boss fucked up in not getting Iraq to agree to permanent occupation and that is the course of action we should have taken in Iraq?
If the success were, indeed, successes and they were lost and abandoned, thatâs due to the free state of Iraq, not for any lack of effort on the part of the US. This stabbed-in-the-back crap went out of fashion with the Nazis.
Let me see, if I recall correctly, it was the Year of Our Sith Lord Cheney 2003âŚ
Ari Fleischer, a member of PNAC.
Ari, havenât you forgottenâŚmission accomplished?
If the mission was accomplished, why is whatâs happening there now, President Obamaâs fault?
Even old mc warmonger says, âwe wonâ!
So, if âwe wonâ, what is your argument for keeping our troops on the ground there?
The new meme and soon-to-be article of faith: Bush and Dave âAll in Paulaâ Petraeus won Iraq, but then Obama lost it!