Posting the same link, over and over, is spam and is a violation of the TOS.
Welcome to being a black man in Ferguson Darren Wilson.
Flag it, I did.
Donât let the screen door hit you, beej. Red State canât wait to have you back.
I just looked over this newbieâs comment history to see exactly how much name-calling s/he has had to endure in 3 days of being a commenter here.
I see @NinaQuin being called out for racist/ignorant comments, and I see @NinaQuin calling another commenter a moron:
So sorry that you can dish it out, but you canât take reasoned (if a bit snarky) response to your intentionally inflammatory posts.
If I were NinaQuin, Iâd heed @AntiSachetDeTheâs advice. Otherwise I expect s/he will be banned by tomorrow.
Really?
Can you tell us what job description includes as part of the job, executing a young black man in the street for the crime of walking in the street?
Except executing a young black man for the crime of walking in the street.
Turn about is fair play, is it not? Or is it only the cool kids that get to do it?
And how, exactly, would a poster of 3 days know this? Unless you are admitting to being a new incarnation of a banned poster.
Climb down off your cross. We need the wood.
Ninabeej got wood when the story broke.
Plus, that job position was filled 2,000 years ago
Funny how you all assume things about people, but then I forgotâŚnone of you are allowed to have a different opinion from that of the collective.
Roger Ailes called. He wants NinaQuinâs surplus crosses. He needs them for his contributors. (The extras will be burned).
Ohh ohh⌠thatâs one of them that scary socializm werds.
Everyone do a shot!
UmmmâŚdid you miss the part where he shot and killed an unarmed person? Dont be so ignorant.
By now itâs pretty obvious that the only first hand favorable witness for Wilson is Wilson himself. The fact that he has not submitted an incident report on the shooting apparently due to 5th Amendment reasons means there will never be a first hand account of the event from Wilson, either written or verbal.
Does anyone seriously think these local authorities have any intention to put a cop, especially a white one, on trial when all the evidence is stacked against him? If they were absolutely forced to, you would see the most intentionally inept prosecution ever in an American courtroom.
All of the actions of the local authorities, from the intentional neglect of collecting immediate testimony from witnesses, the withholding of information from the public, the smearing of the victim (and community), to the heavy handed actions of the police to intentionally incite the protesters have been done to serve and protect the interests of the police and their masters, not the community they control in an Apartheid manner.
I donât need to comment on articles to read the comments on things. It seems people here have the mentality of 12 year olds for the most part.
What next, the neener neener gambit?
Proved my point, youâre what, 12?