“Obviously there is a real concern as to whether there is full transparency,”
U.S. District Court Judge Reggie Walton
Indeed...a very real concern...
In 1989, Barr has already MISLED Congress in omitting parts of Justice Dep’t Memo using exactly the same phrase “summarizes the principal conclusions” as he did in his 3rd letter to Congress re:Mueller's Report!
Barr has been doing VERBAL CONTORTIONS with his letters to Congress...1st letter was req'd, 2nd letter summarized Mueller’s Report with his own opinion/sound bites, 3rd letter says his 2nd letter was not a summary but a "summary of principal conclusions" in other words, a summary non-summary. Note: it's the same phrase used in 1989!
In addition, very, very concerning...
Barr’s answered to Congressional hearing because it apes the VERBAL DIARRHEA of Individual1 i.e. “I think there was spying...but there was NO evidence". Now Barr is peddling spying hoax to Congress which is a sound bite for Individual1 to falsely trumpet/tweet!
What happened to neutral, impartial, and independent USAG for the American People?
In few short weeks, Barr has forgotten that he is the USAG for the American People and NOT for Individual1.
So if Barr is acting/performing as AG of Individual1... then Barr should have taken his son-in-law's job instead!
- In 1992, Barr was referred to as COVER-UP GENERAL Barr
-Barr has already predetermined that Individual1 cannot commit obstruction of justice in his unsolicited memo https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/24/politics/barr-memo-mueller/index.html
-Barr’s son-in-law was hired shortly after he was confirmed AG as Individual1’s legal adviser https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/02/william-barr-son-in-law-white-house