Discussion: Dear America: It's Time To Let Women Serve In All Combat Roles. No Exceptions

Discussion for article #232946

Overturn the universe and inconvenience millions so a few tomboys can go play? Nah.

This is not a good idea.

Letā€™s say some group like ISIS captures a woman soldier. They would probably proceed to have her raped until she died. Is that fifty men, two hundred, ten thousand?

We Americans tend to jump into the shit too easily anyway, without having to watch live streaming of someoneā€™s sister getting gang banged by an enemy battalion.

Sorry girls, not a good idea.

1 Like

Itā€™s not unknown for ISIS and its ilk to rape men too. So itā€™s not a good idea to let men fill combat roles either.

I suspect the deepest, unvoiced objection to women in combat may come from the right. Those pasty white men calling the shots for the right wing donā€™t like the idea that female combat veterans could be coming home and choosing to refuse to take any of the misogynistic, ugly crap the religiofascist Republicans are handing out. I have an idealistic vision of a female Marine combat vet going to the Congressional office building and kicking Todd Akinā€™s skinny ass down the corridors and out into the street.

2 Likes

Girls? Really? You called them girls?

2 Likes

Sure, why not? Itā€™s right and fair. Young women should also be subject to conscription if the need arises. But on the other hand,

ā€˜Yaaayyy, even more cannon-fodder for corporatist politicians and militarists.ā€™

When will war become obsolete?

4 Likes

That speaks volumes about what the OP thinks of women.

2 Likes

Right after religion becomes obsolete.

1 Like

And have them enroll when they are 18.

1 Like

We are the cannon fodder for the 99%. We are dying. No help from the 99%. A vacuous ā€œThank Youā€ here and there. We need to be made well. If the people really cared Congress would be flooded with calls. They donā€™t and never will. There are many acceptions to this but all in all most give lip service.

Come onā€¦stop the pearl clutching. How many blowhards talk about ā€œour boys fighting over thereā€ā€¦? Heā€™s not using ā€œgirlsā€ as a pejorative and you know that. Itā€™s a term of affection, of closeness, and you know that too.

Thereā€™s probably is no good position to take in this debate. I spent a year in heavy combat and for the most part everything I did and was expected to do could be handled by a woman. I certainly fought some very tough women. So as far as their ability to do itā€¦sure they can.

But, at least for now, women joining a rifle squad, becoming a machine-gunner on a tank or taking the Number 2 position on a 155 mm howitzer cannot expect that ā€œmans worldā€ to make any sudden changes. My thoughts are ā€¦the big ā€˜man caveā€™ that is a combat unit is going to take women a little getting used to and it will be a lot harder getting used to that than combat itself. Itā€™s a gross place folks.

Sexuality is going to have to go. You get shot in the chest I am going to rip your shirt open no matter what you have beneath it. Ill expect a woman to have no qualms rendering field care to me if I take shrapnel to my testicles. I donā€™t see ( with the proper conditioning ) any reason why that cannot be done. so thatā€™s probably all that needs to be said about that.

Men and women were created with sexual desires for each other. Weā€™ll need rigid training on the suppression of that. Since sexual attraction is normal thatā€™s going to be a bit tough. Probably can be done as a bunch of normal stuff is not tolerated in the military and it is stifled. The sex stuff is a problem because if not controlled it would be a mission killer. I think it can be done though. NO oneā€™s going to like the methods much.

My biggest concern with woman in combat is that they are women. They have a different way of looking at things then men do and I agree for the most part a superior one. But combat is a fucking ugly mess. Itā€™s real victims are women and childrenā€¦lots or women and childrenā€¦and that is going to be a bit tougher on a woman than it is on a man. Its likely going to be harder for a woman to become an iceman than a man. Actually sub zero icemen break down at times. I really donā€™t think many women want to become icemen so I donā€™t imagine youā€™ll see a flood of them wanting 11.12. or 13 MOSā€™s even if offered to them. Please donā€™t twist this into me saying women are weak and overly emotional. Any married guy like myself will argue against that till the end of time. But they do have a different emotions set than men and combat was tailored for the masculine ones. More work.

This is going to be a lot of work and I doubt youā€™ll see much demand for these positions by women. I donā€™t know many women with a favorable opinion of violence and killing. And if we are talking about the Combat Arms: Infantry, Armor, Artillery and the Combat Engineersā€¦killing is what you are asking them to do.

Rape is a horror but given what can happen to a man or women in combat it pales. Referring to rape in a discussion of women is knee jerk.

Yes, he was using it as a diminutive and therefore pejorative in this context.

2 Likes

Just how can you possibly know that?

1 Like

Yahā€¦I think women should be able to kill innocent foreign Arab terrorists for Exxon, Shell, Chevron and BP. We are America and women should be able to fight for our empire.

You need professional help with your serious head problems.

When Climate Chaos bares down on us like a hammer on a nail and batters us into the ground, wars will come to a stop - maybe. Scientists are ranting about the end of the human species experiment and we go off and fight war for oil. I think we - human beings - are insane. We are addicted to war and money and stuff.

Its not a good idea because the whole premise of massive amounts of gratuitous death of any kind is wrong.
What next once the young women are exhausted (military term), teenagers and Grandparents? Its like, Oh Well, some more of our kids will die, whatā€™s the big deal?
This idea really sucks in fact, we would have excessive troops doing nothing now if it werenā€™t for the hideously stupid war choices we have already been suckered into. There isnā€™t a smart war in our future that requires more human targets that create even more emotional pain for American families. Do these war pigs just like seeing humans die, is it a better/bigger thrill having a woman kill for them?

Canā€™t drones just duke it out? Full on robot wars is the best idea. Let them develop better and better robots, neutral gendered of the perfect fighting age, heartless and powered with recycled freedom fry oil or some such crap. Maybe they could be programmed to figure out the futility of war as they actually fight it, then become fully aware and turn against their masters. This sounds like the best plan to me.

Make less warā€¦Make more love! Peace beotches!