The video depicts her shooting herself. It’s doesn’t suggest anyone should target or threaten her. Copyright and appropriation issues aside what about it would make it a crime? It’s satire. Deal with it.
Various teabagger politicians from around the country have made commercials implying or alluding to gun violence no one contacts the FBI about them.
I would be willing to bet that this admittedly crude and tasteless doctored video represents little or no risk of any personal harm to her. It’s more likely just grandstanding to gain sympathy for her inhumane and stupid gun-nut cause.
They also won’t have to worry their pretty little heads about the past.
Students in South Dakota will now graduate from high school without studying early American history, under new teaching guidelines adopted by the state.
After a year of deliberations, the state Board of Education adopted new curriculum standards that no longer require instructors to teach the first 100 years of U.S. history. Such milestone events and developments as the Revolutionary War and the drafting of the U.S. Constitution could be completely ignored.
Cutting out early U.S. history in 11th grade hurts the ability of students to “think historically” when they reach higher education, according to a letter sent to the state Board of Education by Ben Jones, dean of arts and sciences for Dakota State University and educators from the University of South Dakota, South Dakota State University, Northern State University, Augustana College, Presentation College, the University of Sioux Falls, Black Hills State University and other institutions.
“By that, we mean they are unfamiliar with the use of sources, the identification of bias, analysis of information, understanding context and the development and practice of research that aid them both inside and outside the discipline of history,” according to the letter.
That, of course, might be exactly what the Republican-dominated state government has in mind. “It’s disabling their citizenship,” Jones told the Argus Leader.
But, won’t all the “Good Guys with Guns” protect her from the “Turrur’sts” and “Crazy Lib’ruls”?
What does an Open-Carry, Trained Markswoman, God-Fearing NRA Member in good-standing have to fear from Guns? Guns don’t kill people after all…
Dude. It’s SOUTH DAKOTA.
If it doesn’t have a Scandinavian accent or have anything to do with soybeans, they don’t teach about it anyway.
In this matter which amedment prevails, the 1st or the 2nd?
And especially around gas pumps.
Correct, this site just last week had a story about a NC nut with a shotgun and claiming she was gunning for her opponent because the opponent was not as far far far right as she was…
Aw. Come on. Coffee spewed on the computer screen again.
What’s beyond creepy is the unconscionable behavior of gun manufacturers who profit at the expense of school kids, movie goers, and other innocents. Then deny any culpability. I hope they listened closely to the Pope, but somehow I doubt it.
Gun nuts like Dana Loesch are terrified of their own freakin’ shadows. They live under the illusion that their firesticks make them safe, but yet they feel that they can’t go to the bathroom without packing heat. Idiotic cowards, one and all.
Right. But she has a gun. So what’s she afraid of?
What happens if people like ‘I.L. Kutchakakoff’ and ‘Shitza Brick,’ tweet bad things about her? Will she be making donations in their names too?
And what happens if 100,000 ‘mean tweets’ come in about her? Can Dana afford 100,000 boxes of ammo?
Let’s ask Phil McCrackin or Jack Adogoff what they think.
She’s wearing a likeness of the thing that killed her favorite person. What a surprise.
Everyone knows Jesus was killed by Tetanus.
I’m sorry - who?
What would Freud have said about Loesch? Or any gun-nutter?
Gunz iz magic?
It’s always a good idea to clean your gun on the porch with the light off.
Yes, grisly, much as the giant rock falling on the roadrunner was grisly.