When Trump finally blows, I think he’ll write something like “I like attractive women with class. Look at Stormy Daniels. Do you think I’d tap THAT?”
Trump Spin: I’ve done more to solve the gun crisis in America than any other president!
I had to look that one up! ESAD, indeed.
Let’s put it this way, I hope Stormy has a good resistance to novichok.
I wonder who helped him spell voluminous.
Poor Donny. He so wants to brag about how he banged a porn star. Must be tough for him.
Neither did Franken ever ask Sessions anything about meeting with the Russians, but Trump’s cronies can’t help behaving like guilty dogs.
Cohen wrote that for him. Phrasing (“Never has…”) is too sophisticated and If it was really Trump he’d have capitalized “Our Country.”
Cohen must be the dumbest lawyer ever. By sending a “cease and desist” letter to Trump’s former porn star girlfriend and claiming he was libeled he opened himself and Don the Con up to discovery.
Is it me or are Trump’s lawyers as stupid as him?
You’d think a lawyer would know the definition of libel. And you’d think a lawyer would know, if he watched the interview, that she specifically said that she didn’t know who sent the goon. This just makes it more obvious that Cohen did it, and that’s why he thinks she said it.
Avenatti is amazingly sharp. I’m not a lawyer, but you can see him weighing every sentence as to legal significance, walking right up to the edge over and over, daring Cohen and Trump to try something.
Spelled? How about explained what that means to him.
He probably wrote “voluptuous” in the first draft.
“You and your client’s false statements about Mr. Cohen accuse him of criminal conduct and constitute, among other claims, libel per se and intentional infliction of emotional distress."
Awwww. Poor Michael. The faux thug fixer who threatens people for Trump all the time was caused distress because he was almost accused of being involved in the threatening of Stormy Daniels.
[quote=“demosthenes59, post:50, topic:70044”]
Is it me or are Trump’s lawyers as stupid as him?
[/quote]Well, it isn’t you. So, …
Contrary to some initial comments on Twitter, I thought Stormy Sunday exceeded expectations.
Just under half of that interview focuses on key legal questions around campaign finance violations and the cover up. That’s a big deal. 60 Minutes did a really good job of conveying to people that their interest in this story wasn’t about the salacious sex gossip, but more about the cover up and the legal implications.
And somehow it’s head found it’s way into a bedroom.
I think it is time for ethical investors who care for American children and public safety to buy out gun and ammunition companies and re-purpose their infrastructure, expertise and knowhow for manufacturing other safe high tech products.
Probably typed “va…backspace…vo…” while muttering to himself and predictive spell check offered up “vocal” “voluminous” “valuable” “vacant” etc.
He’s no dummy. The guy’s got some very high value verdicts on his resume and some interesting choices in clients/cases. He strikes me as someone who takes cases because he finds them interesting. My guess is that Cohen and Sekulow haven’t tangled with someone this bright and this motivated before.