So Cohen admits that he sent someone to talk to Daniels/Clifford, but not that she was threatened? Or he admits that he knew about the approach to her? Because if he is completely unconnected to what someone (perhaps a fan of The Apprentice) said to her, then there is no need to take note of it, much less to threaten the woman.
(How come this inept schlepper still has a license to practice?)
Not sure that Cohen really wants to open up the discovery door on such a lawsuit. 
Of course, itās made easier because they ARE fools.
Trump is fucking chewing glass right nowāit is AWESOME!
Even the lawyers lawyer is incompetent and lateā¦total inept circle jerksā¦
DISCOVERY WILL BE FUN TO SEEā¦
Was that buffoon on with Avenatti again?
Interesting and timely summary:
Isnāt that her job description? āMiss the point, and misrepresent facts.ā
āDamn it, woman! That never happened, and I had nothing to do with it.ā
Works for me.
This would help explain why the interview didnāt get published immediately.
Why are you skeptical of that claim? What doesnāt ring true about it?
If Cohen āhad nothing to doā with Daniels being threatened by a goon, how does he know it didnāt happen?
Spock blew up the robotās brain with a question just like that.
I think the American people need to send a cease and desist letter to Trump.
This is Trump World. We all know that this is only stage one of the storyādeny it happened. Stage two coming shortly: Cohen admits that one of his goons did say that to Stormy but he was just expressing concern for her. āHe was just hopinā dat nuttinā would happen to da mudder before her daughter growed up. Who says dereās anythinā wrong with dat?ā And then finally stage three: āOK so he threatened her. So what? He didnāt do nuttinā to her now did he?ā
Weird that Cohen paid her $130K (out of his own pocket, mind you) to keep her quiet about something that didnāt happen. Man, thatās almost as good as those ag subsidies that pay for NOT growing corn. Hey, Mr. Cohen, Iām a great negotiator; for $20,000 Iāll stay quiet about not having sex with Trump too.
You can send this kind of letter to ignorant cowards and maybe it would do some good. Stormy and her lawyer arenāt ignorant cowards. So it adds up to asking pretty please with sugar on top would you not do these things, because we donāt like them at all. Intentional infliction of emotional pain? Itās yet another way of saying you donāt like what a person did, but you donāt have a real grownup tort to point to. Itās all the equivalent of stamping your feet and bursting into tears of impotent rage.
Yep. The Gun companies do much better with scary Demās in office. I know a union busting attorney that makes ALL of his money fighting unions in IL and he ALWAYS votes Dem. Same.
Itās a way of telling your opponent what hurts and where to kick you harder.
āIn truth, Mr. Cohen had absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with any such person or incident, and does not even believe that any such person exists, or that such incident ever occurred,ā Blakely wrote.
Two things:
She didnāt mention Cohen in the interview. Guilty much?
āIn truthā is this letterās version of Trumpās ābelieve me,ā words always accompanied by lies.