I say let Joe Biden be interim POTUS until this is sorted out.
7 Likes
b4 or after debriefing vlad?
1 Like
Iām not holding out much hope but others may change their minds if they see the intelligence brief. I still wonder what that Internet connection between Trump Inc. and Russiaās Alfa Bank was for. It couldāve been spam but just as easily been a FIX protocol connection for financial transactions.
7 Likes
Iām not a hundred percent sure this one would be peaceful and the other side has all the guns. Iām not kidding.
3 Likes
heās a floating slimeball.
1 Like
Yeah but how many of them are there really. Heās going in with one of the lowest approval any incoming president has ever had - 40%. Most of the time they go in at 65%, 75% - they just won an election.
4 Likes
I know, I knowā¦you had to piss in my cornflakes didnāt ya, @darrtown 
1 Like
well, we know who will play trump.
2 Likes
Look. The Republican candidate won based on electoral votes. However, Trump CANNOT be president. But couldnāt the electors vote for Pence? Or anyone else besides he who must not be named?
3 Likes
sure. then burned at the stake.
2 Likes
Republicans also know how unpopular Pence was in Indiana, and McConnell/Ryan/et al have shown theyāre perfectly fine assuming the position for Trump.
3 Likes
Is that even possible? I know weāre in uncharted territory here but, what would be required to get a do-over election or a court case before (I assume) the Supreme Court
I donāt know morrigan_2575, but Iāve seen it mentioned in several places. I have no idea whatās going to happen next. I had no idea this man would be nominated, would actually run or would somehow seem to be elected. But here we are.
First time for everything.
1 Like
I donāt see her avatar, eitherājust the little square thingy with the folded-down upper right corner.
4 Likes
[quote=ātena, post:10, topic:48361, full:trueā]
Personally I would rather not depend on the electors. Iād like to see this whole thing nullified and have a new election or have a court declare that Clinton won.
[/quote]Nullification - I like it. And, even better, itās an utterly Republican kind of thing to do.
1 Like
An utterly South Carolina kind of thing to do, which is perfect since Jim DeMint is whispering in the orange shitgibbonās ear.
1 Like
Thereās no question that many people in the Trumpzi right will consider his removal, regardless of whether itās by impeachment or even resignation, and regardless of whether Republicans join in the effort to remove it.
And thereās likewise no question but that, even if Republicans joined in, all of them collectively, from the poorest voter up to the U.S. Senate, would rather quickly come to think of it as an unfair, unconstitutional, mean, low down dirty thing corrupt Democrat corrupts did to them, a grievance to be written down in their little book of grievances and paid back in kind, magnified a thousand fold, in years to come. Because thatās what they did with Nixon.
9 Likes
No question but when itās a question of our national security, the integrity of our election and outside interference from an historically hostile foreign power, then itās bigger than them.
1 Like
It seems to me as a matter of logic that if the election was tampered with and it was, and even though they are already arguing the harmless error doctrine - yes they did it but it didnāt change anything - we donāt know that but we do know that it canāt have been a fair and open election with the tampering.
So what is left but to declare it null and void and start over? It is the only thing that makes much sense really.
Not saying theyāll do it, but they should.
