Discussion: Brian Schweitzer Doesn't Have Anything Nice To Say About Either Party

Discussion for article #224105

Takes a politician of rare gifts to simultaneously insult both gay men and southern white conservative men.

26 Likes

Wolf killer!

1 Like

“They just have effeminate mannerisms. If you were just a regular person, you turned on the TV, and you saw Eric Cantor talking, I would say—and I’m fine with gay people, that’s all right—but my gaydar is 60-70 percent. But he’s not, I think, so I don’t know.”

Bloody hell Eric.
Just killed any shot you had at riding the K Street gravy train.

jw1

2 Likes

Holy crap.

This guy do speak his mind.

2 Likes

He can expect to get that “gaydar” comment thrown back at him in the future…

3 Likes

I love the guy, and would vote for him in a second, but he will never be POTUS.

I’m not saying I always agree with him; I don’t. A successful national candidate has to avoid conflict that the beltway stenographers can latch onto (the conflicts they ignore are A-OK, as conservatives demonstrate every day).

Anyone who says what they really think ensures that they can’t be elected.

4 Likes

The more this guy talks, the more I dislike him.

11 Likes

“But he’s not, I think, so I don’t know.”

But not knowing will be no hindrance to me babbling on and inferring that he is gay.

I am sorry, I just don’t see this guy as a serious contender for the nomination. Easily could have won the Senate seat in MT this year, but the Dem nomination for the President? Not gonna happen.

7 Likes

Stay in Montana.

8 Likes

This guy is never getting anywhere near the Dem nomination. He’s a climate change denier too.

7 Likes

The bolo ties weren’t enough?

1 Like

Once upon a time, several years ago, I had become a fan of then-Governor Schweitzer based on his record in the Montana statehouse, especially his enthusiastic willingness to pound Republicans in humorous ways while making a political point. I even thought that he had bona fide national potential in the party, as a wisecracking western populist who would be very difficult for Republicans to pigeonhole as an effete, arugula-eating Dem.

Fast forward to today, and it’s evident that either I am guilty of completely deluding myself about what kind of person he actually has been all along, or he is suffering from some sort of mental decline. Seriously, what politician with realistic national aspirations will babble incoherently in public about his “gaydar” telling him that Southern politicians are gay? What Democrat with a tiny particle of common sense attends a Republican gathering and tells Mitt Romney he’s a boatload of fun while saying that the leader of his own party is stiff as a board?

Whether Schweitzer realizes it or not, he is finished as a politician with any real influence in the Democratic Party.

12 Likes

He needs to stay in Montana. Nowhere near ready for primetime

2 Likes

Sounds more like he’s running for the Republican nomination.

5 Likes

Ok, I love that he is trolling southern white twits, but to do it in such a hackneyed, distasteful way is a testament to his lack of imagination and political skills as much as it shows that he is incredibly out of touch with the people he is courting for votes.

3 Likes

And come to think of it, I imagine white southern gay men, both out and closeted conservatives, aren’t going to be inclined to say “hey, that’s the guy I want in the White House” now . . .

3 Likes

Right there with you.

1 Like

PARK CITY, Utah — For a Democrat toying with waging a presidential primary challenge against Hillary Rodham Clinton from the populist left, the exclusive confab of chief executives and Republican donors hosted by Mitt Romney is a most unlikely place to campaign.

But that’s precisely what Brian Schweitzer did this week.

The former Montana governor, MSNBC contributor and 2016 hopeful delivered a stem-winder of a speech to some 300 Republican elites assembled here in a theater-in-the-round setting at a luxury mountaintop resort.

Schweitzer’s remarks Friday afternoon were all over the map — from life lessons he learned as a boy leading his steer at 4-H club showings to his disagreements with the Affordable Care Act and the war in Iraq to sharp criticism of President Obama’s energy policy. And he said the one elected official with whom he agrees on some issues is Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.).

During a question-and-answer session, Republican strategist Ana Navarro asked Schweitzer whether he was more relatable to average voters than Clinton is. The rancher-politician said he is, but quickly segued to a diagnosis of Romney and Obama’s likability in the 2012 election.

“I don’t know why you lost the election, Mitt, but I know this: I was watching you on TV and I didn’t see the Mitt Romney that I knew,” Schweitzer said. “You are a fun guy and you’re easy-going and Obama is not. I’ve been in the room with him a little, too. He’s stiff as a board and you’ve got it going on.”

5 Likes

He pretty much torched his future in the Democratic party when he refused to run for the Senate this year, and instead started making plans for running for President.

Because the two are not mutually exclusive. Indeed, a Senate seat would have provided a much better platform to launch a campaign for president. And he was about the only real chance we had at holding that seat.

I suspect he is in it for the money, and he receives a great deal of personal pleasure from the attention these sort of half cocked statements bring him.

5 Likes