Discussion for article #228762
On behalf of MSNBC, I would like to apologize.
Actually, very few people are watching cable news at all.
So Reillyâs supremacy amounts to being the tallest midget.
His cognitive dissonance must be deafening.
âI bring ratings to those shows,â he told Kurtz. âSo when I go on
Letterman or I go on the morning shows, their ratings go up. Thatâs why they have me on.â
Itâs exactly this sort of unbridled arrogance that causes me to throw heavy objects at my TV when I see Billoâs mug on the box. And because of my reactions Mrs darr in her wisdom has banned my watching this arrogant excuse for a human being. He is insulting, talks over his âguestsâ, and is insufferably arrogant.
The only reason Fox has the number of viewers it has is because itâs basic cable. MSNBC and CNBC are premium.
Cable news compared to network news viewership is minimal.
Iâve always wondered why NBC didnât pressure the cable companies to include their news programs in basic cable like Fox did.
Sometimes I think he actually believes Fox is a news organization.
Bill Oâreilly and Fox News ratings are so high because old white conservatives watch in great numbers. Not only that, cable news ratings arenât big at all anyway. So, go ahead and brag Bill. No-one cares.
I think itâs time for a mercy killing tooâŚitâs time to bury OâReilly and Ailesâ careers, drop molten lead on it and then molten lava.
How can anyone breath with OâReillyâs ego consuming all the oxygen in the room?
If anyone knows about a channel licensed as entertainment by the FCC while purporting to broadcast the news, it would be a FOX noise shill like OâReally.
Iâve asked this same question to Comcast, who incidentally also owns MSNBC. They told me that as part of their merger agreement with NBC/Universal, Comcast was to treat NBC-owned channels (e.g. CNBC, MSNBC, NBC Sports, Bravo, USA) as separate entities entitled to no special treatment with regard to carriage fees.
Here in Seattle, you need to have a higher-end digital package (Digital Starter) whereas Fox News can be had on the low-end Digital Economy.
Plus I have a sneaking suspicion that Comcast is not at all upset about this.
âKilling Lincoln,â âKilling Kennedy,â "Mercy-killingâŚâ
Whatâs with all the murderous talk? Doesnât Fox Not the News have ENOUGH blood on its hands?
MSNBCâ potential audience is working. FauxNewsâ is retired and lapping up the race-baiting, the conservative victimization, and self-righteous nonsense like dogs at a gravy bowl.
There are no highly rated cable news channels, at least not these days. Even Billo canât pull enough to compete with nearly all of the other basic cable channels. The real question is why is Fox still on basic cable. It ought to be replaced by reruns of the Property Brothers and moved to premium status where it should be.
Killing OâReilly is a book Iâd buy.
And his âKilling Lincolnâ and âKilling Kennedyâ books are just a rehash of the similar books written by Jim Bishop 50-60 years ago. Nothing original in Bill Orallyâs books
Basic cable, on top of an older demographic that may not be as familiar with alternative sources of information, and on top of that Fox News tends to be one of the only outlets for news that conservatives will tune into. MSNBC has far more competition when it comes to all of the other demographics that arenât hard right and canât take the Fox News hypocritical bullshit and faux outrage. Itâs always silly to me when people tout Fox Newsâ ratings as some sort of indicator as to how the nation leans ideologically.
FOX News will always have a leg up in the ratings simply because illiterate people watch a lot of TV. Others use multiple sources to get their information books, newspapers etc.
Billo reminds me of one of those art farts who praises a painting as a âbeautiful example of Rembrandt at the height of his powersâ and then two months later the painting is proven to be a fake.