Discussion for article #223242
ââŚSo in case you were wondering whether Trebek agreed with the overwhelming consensus of climate scientists who believe human activity contributes to global warmingâŚâ
We werenât.
Now, now, heâs very influential with the old people.
What a SHOCK!!!
The host from a âspin-the-wheel-and-guess-lettersâ show mocks global warming, and the host from a âactually-know-millions-of-facts-and-quickly-spout-them-outâ show knows the facts.
Iâm flabbergasted.
RACIST!!!11
BTW, if he merely âbelievesâ it, then heâs not much better than Pat Sajack. Belief has little to do with it. The DATA says itâs true. And data just doesnât lie.
âif he merely âbelievesâ it, then heâs not much better than Pat Sajack.â
Youâre being ridiculously contentious on a semantic point. I believe that evolution is a fact. Does that mean Iâm not much better than Ken Ham?
What do talk show hosts think about the relationship between tax rates and the marginal propensity to consume in this country?
Youâre reading that way wrong.
âI fact that climate change is real.â Is that what he should have said?
BREAKING NEWS: conservative white man believes in science. Details at 11!
The old socially liberal, fiscally conservative card eh Alex? So Alex believes in science when it comes to the environment, but not when it comes to the failure of âtrickle downâ economics? Understand thatâs what a white conservative means when they talk about being âfiscally conservativeâ. Heâs not a racist, just the policies he supportsâŚsee?
âFiscally conservativeâ is such an ambiguous term. He might have come out with the âsocially liberal, fiscally conservativeâ moniker, knowing that itâs a middle ground. If heâd said, âIâm a screaming liberal,â then Fox would make him the lead story about how he is indoctrinating the world with socialism.
Hold the presses!!! Another game show host has weighed in on global warming!
YeahâŚI can just hear the RWNJs saying "but that one doesnât count.
âHeâs Canadian, donât yaâ know?â
Ehh?
I think Iâll keep an open mind until Wink Martindale weighs in on this.
BTW, OT but âYooperâ was just added to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary this year. Canât believe it took them this long to get around to that oneâŚ
Is he still alive?
That is what happens when you base your entire career on getting the FACTS RIGHT.
You tend to believe THE FACTS, not the New-Speak of the corporate-deniers.
Well, I know I like him, and donât call me old!
Iâll take science facts for $200 AlexâŚ
Ding, ding, dingâŚ
Youâve hit the Daily Double!!!
You forgot to add: ââŚthrough facts and knowledge.â
That? Would be âworthyâ of a FuxNewsscrollingchyron.
jw1
I donât think thatâs fair of you, Maxie. In fact, I donât see anything conservative about shifting the tax burden from the rich to the poor and middle-classes, or denying the need to raise the debt ceiling.
Many liberals are concerned with cronyism, the huge cost over-runs of military and other government operations, the chicanery in our tax code that favors the extremely wealthy, the increasing amount of the budget that goes to servicing the national debt, etc.
I feel the supply-siders, free market fundamentalists, and anti-government extremists have highjacked the term âconservatism,â just as I feel that anti-abortionists, dominionists, homophobes and zenophobes have arrogated unto themselves an unwarranted monopoly on what it means to be a âChristianâ that supports âfamily values.â