Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden’s campaign on Monday said that he won’t support defunding police departments amid a nationwide push for just that in the wake of George Floyd’s death.
Smart move, because the phrase “Defund the Police” is very easily weaponized.
I do think Biden needs to be a little stronger on the reform angle to include getting rid of bad apples. Like getting behind the House Democrats plan to get rid of “qualified immunity” for police officers. I haven’t read all of Biden’s policy positions, so maybe he’s already backing that.
What exactly does that mean? I’d say this term is inappropriate. It should say “calls from certain quarters,” and name them, or something. This is too generic, especially in the face of what Nancy Pelosi is saying, for example.
Take away the GOP’s ability to campaign on " the crazy, no-nothing libs want to get rid of police."
Now Joe, talk more about the reforms needed to serve and protect with justice for all.
Steve “David Dukes without the baggage” Scalice, as his own campaign literature once claimed is the perfect Republican to represent that party on this issue. “David Dukes without the baggage” is by definition a clansman with the hood still over his face/yet to identify himself and is exactly the honest poster person to oppose reforms in the wake of the murder of Floyd and others.
Agreed. Good for Joe. First of all, it’s terrible branding. Most people, no matter how much they like or hate the police, understand there’s a societal need for policing. The idea of getting rid of police departments entirely probably only appeals to a tiny fraction of voters. Secondly, the focus needs to be on reform. I suspect most people, even quite a few Republicans, agree that there needs to be reform.
Defund means different things to different areas and different advocates.
But I think the discussion needs to develop to include how cities are rethinking the allocation of half of most municipalities’ discretionary spending to law enforcement, and examining the roles police should to play in communities and determine if the money could be more effectively spent elsewhere to solve underlying problems.
Over the past 40 years, budgets for social service have been under stress and the missions of addressing drug addiction, homelessness, and mental illness have been outsourced to police departments that all too often treat them the same way you’d treat victim crimes.
It’s a little more complex than using a one-word solution, but I think this is an opportunity here.