Or she doesn’t need him to charge Trump and/or Giuliani.
Another possibility? Women turn out in record numbers to vote down supporters of laws controlling their health care and reproductive decisions - Beto wins.
Haha thanks. Of course it took no special insight. You just look at what’s in front of your nose, as George Orwell suggested, and try to see it for what it is, which he said actually takes an effort. I was raised not to put too much stock in big talk from loudmouth morons. And if I don’t see any tangible signs of an impending civil war, you’ve got your work cut out for you persuading me otherwise. I’ve been mentioning this guy I saw on YouTube who said it was “go time.” He had a gun! Oh noes! But I haven’t heard anything alarming about his going anywhere in particular, and if he did anything when he got there, I haven’t heard about that either. The only place I know of that he did go is on YouTube, and the only thing he did there was talk. That’s a long, long way from a civil war.
I don’t believe there are, the reason Raffenspeeger recorded the call with Trump is because of the call with Graham. I think he wishes he did record these initial calls and made up for it later.
“You’ll have to pry the mobility scooter from my COLD, DEAD HANDS!!!”
(“Look out – I think he’s got a Bostitch. Those things can staple up to 30 pages at a time!”)
Alright someone help me out here…if Graham wants to hide behind the “Speech & Debate Clause” because at the time he was the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee:
Does the changes to the way states hold their elections come from the Senate Judiciary Committee?
Doesn’t Graham, or the Senate Judiciary Committee have staff that do the actual research?
Beside GA SOS, how many other state’s SOS had Graham been surveying?
And finally, if Graham was conducting research to aid in his Debate and Speech before the Senate or Judiciary Committee what was he researching, and where are his notes?
And yes I’m being literal here.
A sobbing father tells @BetoORourke during a rally in Fredericksburg, Texas, that his Republican family will vote for him because he’s taking on the issue of gun violence: “My sons are very tough, but they can’t stop a bullet.” #txlege pic.twitter.com/nSXPSyZpeE
— Shannon Watts (@shannonrwatts) August 20, 2022
Did you have to post this? Please pass the eye bleach.
Alright. Sorry. I’ll take it down. Please forgive me.
I think you can trust that feeling. I can actually think of a wide range of people it wouldn’t interest. It does seem clear why the gentlemen don’t already have a special lady in their lives.
Perhaps you’re assuming facts not in evidence.
If you know what I mean, and I think you do.
(“Not that there’s…you know…anything wrong with that.”)
I guess trump is projecting again…
Heh, a broken down nag…
That’s what some call old-fashioned campaigning. I also believe that some people enjoy that kind of thing, even as arduous as it is.
In Russia it’s the Narode ,the masses, who have the power and they can turn in an instant. Less than 900 Bolsheviks in Moscow in 1917.
My assumption is clowns like that would be loath to admit it to themselves if they were gay. (That said, the Proud Boys are into some very strange stuff.) I don’t mean to be all heteronormative. I’m just looking at the situation, very briefly, and assessing it based on the odds, so to speak. These characters I think are mostly just very, very, very, very misguided and confused about what would impress anyone but a woman at least as weird as they are.
I suspect having a woman in their lives would not help the average proud boy much. They’re too far down the rabbit hole to save.
Let me add that I have been married a very long time and she is a stabilizing force for me.