An FBI intelligence analyst reportedly warned months before the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection that efforts to overturn the election results could lead to violence.
Prior to al Qaedaâs attack on the U.S. on September 11, 2001, CIA Director George Tenet subsequently reported that âthe system was blinking red.â Despite White House briefings on the bin Laden, intelligence agencies and domestic law enforcement failed to share crucial information.
The system was blinking red before January 6, 2021, and is blinking red again now for gatherings presumably planned for the end of September 2021.
HEED THE WARNINGS THAT THE SYSTEM IS BLINKING RED!!! THIS TIME, AS WAS JANUARY 6TH, 2021, IT IS DOMESTIC TERRORISM!!!
Well, surprise - who squashed that report? I knew of all these threats all along from the reporting that was being done here and on other websites. It was pretty common knowledge to anyone paying attention.
The one thing America can be certain of is that with trillions of dollars spent for the âbestâ defense and intelligence on the planet, the next âunknowableâ terrorist attack will have had a string of easy-to-follow warnings and planning all of which will have been ignored by those entrusted to prevent them.
All of the red flags before 9-11 were ignored as well, again to fulfill various agendas.
I remember the early warnings were reported, what I canât remember is what knocked them out of the 24 hour news cycle.
Timing is everything, except when we had a POTUS that created 5 crisis/crises before 5PM, each and everyday.
Add into the mix how everyone got see how TFG got his upside down bible holding photo op, that reaction created hesitancy in how law enforcement treated threats. Real and perceived threats.
Iâm pretty sure this is at the heart of the January 6 commission. I think they want to make that connection and their actions so far seem consistent with this goal. Itâs super important that they do this.
The FBI analyst cited findings of SITE Intelligence Group, which describes itself as âthe worldâs leading non-governmental counterterrorism organizationâ in their email when warning that militia groups are pushing âincreasingly violent rhetoric, expressing a new level of escalation by declaring, âThe fight is now.ââ
Well, Texas has now âdeputizedâ all of those militias groups, so their next insurrection will obviously be legal. Any violence that occurs is obviously the fault of the left-wing Defenders of Democracy.
âthe FBI analyst wrote, before urging recipients to âkeep your head on a swivel,â â
Sounds like Linda Blair in the Exorcist. Was this so they could fit in with the Trumpers? Given some of the videos of the Jan 6th crowd, this seems like an effective strategy.
I notice that even though they do mention âcounter protestersâ in this report that there is never, and has never, been any evidence of Leftist organizing or disseminating ANY info, let alone false and disproved conspiracy theories.
So it isnât like they are prioritizing the lefty chatter and taking that seriously. There isnât any. Every time anything like this gets mentioned, the only chatter they can point to is RW and it is false, and full of conspiracy malarkey and always inciting violence.
It seems reasonable to postulate that how the Biden administration deals with the 9/18 outpouring of hyped outrage over the injustices heaped upon the 1/6 coup-plotters will provide a reasonable baseline for assessing what should have been done in response to Januaryâs assembly of wannabe insurrectionists. (Note: I take Donnieâs response to the BLM protests of the summer as bloated by his fear and, therefor, a suitable model for nothing.)
While itâs not really necessary, it provides a real world model of what could have been done and investigating why it wasnât.
Yes, I suspect a suicide attack by Islamic extremists from Saudi Arabia wasnât part of the Cheney administrationâs chosen narrative for war in the Middle East.