Like other state Republican committees whose senators voted to convict now-ex President Donald Trump in his second impeachment trial, the Alaska GOP is out to punish Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK)-and it’s going even further than the rest.
Alaska (unless the GOP successfully overturns it in court) has a “jungle primary” where everyone runs regardless of party followed by a general election in which ranked choice voting is used. The chance of a far right GOP candidate winning is slim to none.
Al Gross, who ran against Sullivan doesn’t look bad, to me. Not necessarily a Democrat, per se, but, close enough for Alaska. (I must admit, however, I don’t understand anything about politics in Alaska. Murkowski was primaried last time, I believe, and won as a write-in candidate, and everyone knows, that NEVER works. Can’t happen.)
And it’s a very good thing for, say, Republicans to contemplate, but a bit of context puts the rest of us on notice as well:
When people come to see us, we foolishly prattle, lest we be inhospitable. But things said for conversation are chalk eggs. Don’t say things. What you are stands over you the while, and thunders so that I cannot hear what you say to the contrary. A lady of my acquaintance said, “I don’t care so much for what they say as I do for what makes them say it.”
– Emerson, 1875
It’s one person’s credo, but that doesn’t mean it can’t be everyone’s!
That was over a decade ago when the Tea Party was new on the scene and she barely hung onto her seat. Today’s iteration of the GOP is even worse than the Tea Party and they only require one thing to be a member in good standing: absolute and total loyalty to Donald John Trump (what a stupid name). A decent Dem candidate can most definitely take out a divided GOP in Alaska, especially if Dems and some indies line up behind a single candidate. Begich barely lost his seat to Sullivan.
Are you sure of this? Ranked-choice voting isn’t useful or necessary in a two-candidate race.
A ranked-choice primary followed by a top-two general would make more sense, although if the scoring is done properly in the primary there isn’t a need for a general unless voter preferences change.
OK, so I want to get up to speed: has Alaska adopted any sort of ‘sore loser’ law that would prevent Murkowski from running as write-in if she is successfully primaried?
All of the electoral analysis I’ve seen from anybody I consider credible opines that the new Alaska system, which I won’t attempt to describe fully because it’s above my head, makes Murkowski essentially immune to challenges from the right.
Which I won’t lose sleep over. Better a Murkowski than a Tommy Tuberville.