WTF is “intricate understanding”? A sophisticated understanding of intricate subject matter, sure, maybe, but intricate understanding is a tell on a dimwit who has a hard time forming coherent thoughts.
11 Likes
WHICH is the dumbest ‘theory’ of the case: the NEST Thermometers; the Microwave interference; the Italian satellites; or Gina Haspel being kidnapped (Germany or Italy? I can’t remember now) because they are ALL so bloody insane.
8 Likes
Election Fraud Investigator, the new, reactionary sinecure.
Appropriate for the fruit of Donnie’s efforts, as are the attempts to shield the ‘investigation’ from any kind of accountability.
5 Likes
Conveniently enough, guess who appoints and oversees the law enforcement types who might look at these millions in wasted money as deliberate misappropriation of government funds for the enrichment of friends and associates.
8 Likes
Uncanny … can coke do this to you?
As in: What’s all that white stuff on the mirror there? – (Jamaican accented reply) Etobicoke, mahn!
6 Likes
Vos and the rest of the GQP are just trying to drag this out long enough for the fall election. They are confident one of their candidates will win and they have free rein.
Of course the T**** endorsed candidate has said he has no interest in overturning 2020. We’ll see what he says when TFG is here for the rally next month.
9 Likes
Why are Wisconsin voters voting for GOP criminals?
7 Likes
It would be nice if there were some way to sue him for perpetrating a fraud on the people by his machinations, if his bar membership is active, they certainly should take a look at all the contempt holdings and the overall fraud he’s been engaging in.
11 Likes
I’m thinking it’s just a coincidence. There were a lot of people doing coke years ago and still are now and if it turned even a small percentage into big moon-faced porkers when they weren’t before I think it would have been noticed.
11 Likes
So in Wisconsin they have a couple of ways to get judges onto the courts, but it depends on the court type. In Gableman’s case:
The seven justices of the Wisconsin Supreme Court are elected in statewide nonpartisan elections. Judges serve ten-year terms, and to remain on the court, they must run for re-election after their term expires. Only one seat may be elected in any year, and more than two candidates for each seat must file in order to have primary.[2][3]
But now I can’t remember if he lost his bid for a second term, or he didn’t run. But mien gott that man was on the WI SC for 10 long years… 
7 Likes
Is that Gableman in the pic above this story? Seems to be me they should’ve put up a pic of the soon to be retiring judge Dane County Circuit Judge Valerie Bailey-Rihn who slapped the Rs with a fine. She’s the hero. Gableman remains the villain.
17 Likes
In best schoolmarm voice: Good question, Johnny!
5 Likes
Trump 2024: Recount 2020
6 Likes
Here you go:
The thing is, Gableman is pretty much the face of this scandal, which of course is a misfortune for the scandal.
21 Likes
'…learn about the Chinese possibly tampering with election machines, which in his own words was not borne out.” Reports that traces of soy sauce were found on several dozen ballots have not been confirmed.
8 Likes
IKR, but more importantly why do they re-elect fiscally irresponsible Republicans? That’s the question, and the proof is right there in the newspapers, and lost court cases.
4 Likes
Thanks. Let’s give heroes their due.
8 Likes
Four Americans died in Benghazi and if any of their names were mentioned by the prosecutors, especially Pompeo who was there to simply make a name for himself, I didn’t hear it. They came to bury Clinton, not to praise their countrymen.
11 Likes
And their spiritual leader and inspiration, the person who said things were getting too silly:
6 Likes
Oh, I did love these guys. No Googling, but he was Graham something, and was the first of the lads to die, I think.
4 Likes