A lot of things happened. Here are some of the things. This is TPM’s Morning Memo.
More than two years after the Jan. 6 attack, the Justice Department is finally getting around to subpoenaing Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows.
An outside observer would be forgiven for thinking that the American justice system was not blind to wealth and status. Good thing we have those blindfolded statues of justice to reassure us!
I remain baffled by how long it’s taken the Justice Department to pull the trigger on this subpoena
Donnie isn’t going anywhere, unless he dies. And if he dies, then YAY!
If he lives, then all this delaying does is bring the announcement of indictments a little closer to primary season. Which does neither Trump nor Pence any favors. If Trump truly had any hope that he wouldn’t be indicted, he wouldn’t have fought anything. “I’m innocent, so let’s get the truth out as soon as possible.” But he did the opposite. And everyone knows why.
All the delaying does is make him look more and more guilty (and desperate).
In an article about subpoenaing Mark Meadows, @emptywheel points out:
… DOJ’s Justice Manual requires specific approvals before subpoenaing someone if the person is a target.
> If a voluntary appearance cannot be obtained, the target should be subpoenaed only after the United States Attorney or the responsible Assistant Attorney General have approved the subpoena. In determining whether to approve a subpoena for a “target,” careful attention will be paid to the following considerations: > * The importance to the successful conduct of the grand jury’s investigation of the testimony or other information sought; > * Whether the substance of the testimony or other information sought could be provided by other witnesses; and > * Whether the questions the prosecutor and the grand jurors intend to ask or the other information sought would be protected by a valid claim of privilege. (https://www.emptywheel.net/2023/02/16/the-escalating-aggressive-intensifying-step-of-subpoenaing-key-witness-mark-meadows/ )
ETA: @emptywheel also says, “DOJ seems to be treating subpoenas about discreet topics individually, meaning a witness who might have a good deal of exposure in one area may nevertheless be asked to testify about another area. Something similar could be true here.”
That any of this, or Meadows show of cooperation, would account for the delay seems to me an open question.
Why is DOJ Only Now Supoenaing Mark Meadows? Two word answer: Jack Smith. Longer answer, DOJ before Jack Smith should not be confused with DOJ after Jack Smith when it comes to investigating top Republicans in the Trump administration for their roles in fomenting January 6. There is a two word answer for that distinction too.
After they returned from Vancouver someone actually said to me that there were so many Chinese immigrants in BC that it was “like a foreign country up there”.
I thought that would make an excellent tourism promotion: “Canada! It’s like a foreign country up here!”.