A white woman whose encounter with a Black man birdwatching in Central Park in went viral in late May made a second call to 911 falsely claiming that he attempted to assault her that was previously unreported, according to prosecutors.
She was going to cow him or get his blood: a black man had the temerity to suggest that she had to follow the same rules as the parkâs other visitors.
"During her second call, Amy Cooper allegedly accused Christian Cooper of endangering her life and claimed that he was trying to assault her.
A criminal complaint filed by the DAâs office noted that when police arrived, Amy Cooper told an officer that she made false reports, and denied that Christian Cooper touched or assaulted her."
So Judge Barrett, systemic racism doesnât exist, huh?
âChristian Cooper recorded Amy Cooper in a video calling 911 and frantically claiming that her âentire life is being destroyedâ by an African-American manâ.â
Only someone drunk on pink privilege could view as an existential threat a minority with the gall toâŚ
I read that the rescue that she got the dog from took it away, and then gave it back.
I suspect that if she had succeeded in getting the police to arrest Mr. Cooper, or shoot him because he tried to show them his ID, or didnât comply fast enough, or too fast for them and the dog got killed in the process people would be more upset that the dog died, instead of what she tried to do to Mr. Cooper.
What part of the system did Amy Cooper represent? As far as I could tell, given the outcome with a live black man, this would argue this is an example of the opposite.
Food for thought, with this singular example. Amy Cooper represents a white woman scared of being isolated with a black man and having a hysterical over reaction. If there had not been real danger to the life of the man she reported, it would have been comical.