Mark Zaid, the national security lawyer who is currently representing the whistleblower behind a bombshell complaint about President Donald Trump’s call with Ukraine, said on Sunday morning that he is now representing a second whistleblower.
Trump DEMANDS to know identity of 2nd whistleblower in 5…4…3… 2…
The military will soon be needed to ferret out the myriad evil conspiracies against the biggest, most unfairly treated victim in human history.
We have a first hand account. It’s in the transcript the white House released. We need to stop acting like credibility or sourcing is an issue on this point.
The Trump faithful are already slamming him/her without knowing him/her or the information anymore than the rest of us
The intelligence community has had enough.
Open the floodgates.
“See, there’s good whistleblowers on both sides.”
The more whistlers the merrier!
Trump and his allies have tried to undermine the first whistleblower’s credibility on the basis that he or she did only had “second-hand” knowledge. However, first-hand knowledge is not a requirement to file a whistleblower complaint.
Dems have got to stop playing this particular game – and make the point that there is no issue of whistleblower credibility. The whistleblower is entitled to remain anonymous – and the only thing that matters is that the IG found his/her information credible.
And Trumpy, we ain’t talking dog whistles now!
We all know what’s coming:
This second whistleblower must be impeached! And this lawyer must be impeached, too! And you get an impeachment, and you get an impeachment!
Exact phrase I was going to post.
I gotta get up earlier.
If only Nancy had started the inquiry earlier. /s
drip Drip DRIP FLOW GUSH FLOOD
You find the best political cartoonists. They have so much material to work with.
I thought the lawyer gets tried for treason. That or Devin Nunes sues the lawyer for defamation. In American Samoa.