Former Trump acting Defense Secretary Chris Miller said it’s “pretty definitive” that the deadly Capitol insurrection earlier this year wouldn’t have happened if then-President Trump didn’t deliver a fiery speech hours before the attack urging his supporters to “fight like hell” to overturn Joe Biden’s electoral victory.
wouldn’t have happened if then-President Trump didn’t deliver a fiery speech hours before the attack urging his supporters to “fight like hell” to overturn Joe Biden’s electoral victory.
Oh. So it was the speech that caused the attack on the capitol, not the weeks of planning and free busses bringing just randomly* selected people from 100s of miles around to the capitol on that day. And were any of these randomly selected people also compensated for food and lodging?
*randomly selected people that just happened to meticulously plan their weapons logistics.
Considers Trump guilty, makes excuses for himself. Typical response. And, Miller’s suggesting that he “was unsure whether Trump thought through the dire consequences of his incendiary speech” is really rich. Donnie doesn’t think through anything he says, dire or otherwise. It’s called reckless blathering.
“It seems cause-and-effect,” Miller said, referring to Trump’s rally speech. “The question is, did he know he was enraging people to do that? I don’t know.”
Er, it was denouement of a four months campaign.
I can’t think of much else he coulda had in mind.
Suggestions, anyone?
Nice try, but I think people don’t arrive in body armor, loaded with convenient weapons and handcuffs, just happen to have gas masks and helmets on just to listen to a Trump speech.
There is ample evidence from T rumpp’s speeches before this indicating that Jan. 6th was tremendously important. Couple that with the social media posts of PBs and OKs all indicating that 1-6 was a planned event, complete with back-up support if/when things turned violent, all this indicates t rumpp knew what he was saying, and that he knew that his words would result in a violent riot. It was all too coordinated across too broad a scale to leave any doubt that the entire insurrection was planned, and that t rumpp knew precisely what he was doing.
idk, there’s something wrong with the question of “did he know he was enraging people to do that?” - which somehow is an operative question of whether something rises to criminal incitement. I’d say it was reckless and negligent - considering he was involved in the planning process and knew they didn’t have a permit for a ‘march’ down to the capitol - and he told them to go down there. To me that means he knew he was already telling them to do something that they weren’t allowed to do, and that would make him culpable as a conspirator to anyone elses criminal acts they performed down the road. How the fuck is that wrong?
This cocksucker is a conspirator or at least an accessory before the fact - but he’s somehow skating away on the good old “aw shucks I didn’t know anyone would get mad that I lied and said the election was stolen and they won’t have a country anymore” bullshit? Fuck that.
Which is the best possible take on way too much of that administration’s actions. Personally, I prefer malicious.
That said, it’s past time he’s held accountable for at least a little of it.
So transparent. He is doing the usual thing dirty Trump co-conspirators do when caught, playing the victim and pointing at another target. The responsibility for delaying aid to the Capitol police and refusing them adequate personal protection like riot gear is HIS. Even if it turns out that Trump ordered him to stand down during the coup attempt and maybe consolidate “victory” afterwards, he swore to obey the Constitution and not corrupt orders.
Full investigation of the actions and communications of him and the other suspicious Trump appointments to the DoD is absolutely vital. We already know there was insider Trump conspiracy in the DoJ. And everyone knows no coup is successful without support from the military.