President Donald Trump on Tuesday said he expected the military to consider disciplinary action against Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, the ousted National Security Council official who testified in the House impeachment inquiry into Trump.
“Trump on Tuesday said he expected the military to consider disciplinary action against Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, the ousted National Security Council official who testified in the House impeachment inquiry into Trump.”
“That’s going to be up to the military, we’ll have to see,” Trump told a reporter who asked if he thought the military should take disciplinary action against Vindman.
Seems like a strange question from the reporter. Other than in the sick mind of the orange menace, why would anyone think there is any reason for the military to take disciplinary action?
Individual 1’s incoherent musings are evidently taken by all as a direct order now. So, I am sorry the system failed you, Lt Col Vindman. You did a great and brave thing, but best get your affairs in order.
I have really tried to have, and encourage others to have, faith in the resiliency of our institutions. But today I just feel so much sadness – grief, really – over what is happening. There is a cancer in the White House, and it has spread to the Justice Department."
“It remains unclear who exactly gave the order for prosecutors to reduce Stone’s sentencing recommendation. But it comes around the same time as Trump issued an angry tweet complaining that Stone was being treated unfairly.”
“What he did was, he reported a false call.” Sounds like Trump is calling for disciplinary action based on Vindman’s false testimony. C’mon, Army Chief of Staff Gen McConville, do as your Commander-in-Chief suggests. Open an investigation, call witnesses. I believe that John Bolton and Mick Mulvaney have relevant testimony.
Well, since the test question has always been about whether he could shoot someone on fifth avenue, not burn someone to death… Lemme check with my buddy MoscowMitch…