MADISON, Wis. (AP) — President Donald Trump lost a federal lawsuit Saturday while his attorney was arguing his case before a skeptical Wisconsin Supreme Court in another lawsuit that liberal justices said “smacks of racism” and would disenfranchise hundreds of thousands of voters only in the state’s most diverse counties.
Charlie wasn’t a friend of Trump’s, thus no family and friends medical expediency pass.
So the lawyer arguing that he his vote is illegal and wants struck void why should the court deny him that? Let every voter in Dane and Milwaukee Counties that think their vote is legal even if they followed the directions given should step right and demand that their votes should also be struck void.
What Justice Karofsky possibly does not understand, to Trump this is the primary reason he expects a ruling in his favor. The GOP tends to attract racists these days.
It’s really past due time for sanctions, when you have demonstrably bad-faith and illegal arguments being made over and over again. It’s an abuse of the legal system.
Agreed. Attorneys General in all the states where Trump and his campaign have filed suits should form a “class” and file a class-action suit to recover the costs of defending their states’ voters against the irrational and illegal attempts to overthrow the vote plus punitive damages to dissuade such challenges in the future.
I understand the Trump campaign has raised over $208 million in political fundraising since November 3.
trumps revenge list is way to long now.
he can’t live long enough to get even with all those people that stabbed him the back.
Constitution still remains all powerful.
Thank Goodness
Justice Rebecca Dallet, another liberal justice, questioned why Trump didn’t raise his same concerns about the absentee ballot process in the 2016 election that he won in Wisconsin. Troupis said Trump was not an aggrieved party that year.
“Yeah, lady, we only do this if he loses.”
This should have lost this guy the case right there.