There is no point of law for EP. It’s this ephemeral concept that never gets case law because it either ends in negotiations or the clock running out, so not much to go off of.
Thus spake the voice of total innocence.
It would take four. Three heretics produces a 50/50 tie and Pence cannot be the tie breaker.
Executive privilege does not, or at least should not, be available to completely block a witness. It can only be asserted to block a reply to a specific question, and it cannot be used to hide criminal behavior. That puts all the weight on Roberts.
If it does it shouldn’t, makes absolutely no sense as it would be antithetical to the very concept of impeachment powers. But if it does exist in some form, I’d wager it would only have to do with protection of state secrets that are extraneous to the impeachment and inextricably related to national security. I don’t believe for a minute it could be meant to obstruct germane testimony.
My general understanding is if there’s a question of underlying criminality EP goes out the window, yes.
So is he also going to block the publication of Bolton’s book? Why didn’t he block the
publications from Anonymous?
I’m sure the Speaker is aware - she’s always steps ahead of us. I wonder what her next jujitsu move will be.
Remember, McConnell has already admitted working hand in glove with Trump in preparing for the Senate trial. Is there any doubt that McConnell is completely on board with this executive privilege nonsense? He probably suggested it. Let me remind you that you don’t have to live in Kentucky to vote against Mitch McConnell.
Here’s definition of a “Eunuch!”
I wonder if Trump has had them castrated?
Someone should explain to Trump that executive privilege does not protect statements made as part of a criminal conspiracy or which, in themselves, form the corpus of a crime (i.e., statements made to solicit a bribe or to obstruct justice). Mind you, I don’t think it will register with him, but it will allow us to tell who (if anyone) in the White House understands the law and the Constitution—because Trump will fire anyone trying to give him that advice.
For the sake of Fat Donnie and his crime family. Not to be confused with witness tampering.
I remember once hearing a recording of the last Vatican castrato singing. His voice, to me, was like something out of a horror film, not a boy’s voice and not a woman’s either, just surreal.
OT 





Trump’s Middle Name
January 10, 2020 at 11:06 pm EST By Taegan Goddard 188 Comments
Inside the Hive: “ Vanity Fair special correspondent Gabriel Sherman, who was attending the Golden Globes for his show, The Loudest Voice , relayed a story that sums up the Trump presidency and the mess we’re currently living in.”
“Standing near the bar, Sherman ran into Frank Luntz, the Republican pollster, and the two started chatting. Sherman asked Luntz when he last saw the President. ‘Last week, at the White House Christmas party,’ Luntz said. Sherman asked what the two men talked about, to which Luntz replied that he had asked Trump what his middle initial ‘J’ stands for. ‘Genius,’ Trump responded.”
" Trump Indicates He’ll Seek To Block Key Impeachment Witnesses’ Testimonies At Trial"
In other words, the cover-up is the defense.
The idea that there is some sort of “privilege” barring witness testimony in a Senate impeachment trial is mind-blowing. There is no privilege to cover up crimes!
Give that man a silver dollar!
Trump seems to be forgetting one important thing and that is, EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE MAY NOT BE INVOKED TO COVER UP CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES!
Apparently, there’s an interesting article in WaPo behind a paywall from George Conway and Neal Katyal, advising Pelosi to split the articles and send them separately. First, the Obstruction, then later the abuse of power charges. Unfortunately, I don’t have access to the article.
I’d love to know what Conway’s game is.
Never saw that coming (shits self laughing).
Will this get you past the paywall?
You can try readerview if you’re on a mac:
No, it didn’t, but thanks. I’m on an iPhone.