Wow, most masochists keep it in the bedroom. Or dungeon. The humiliation kink runs wild in the GQP. I don’t normally kink shame but the orange taint must taste real good
Hence the quibble . Although we are now polarized, we’re not ideologically, clultishly polarized in the way the US electorate is. Nor are we hate-mongering the ‘others’ among us. Wanted to point that out.
I missed this article a couple of days ago. I think this is also a significant intimidation factor with the courts today that should really be made apparent. There’s a link to the NYT article in MM but I don’t have subscription so here’s the link for those of us again in the cheap seats:
Headline: Judges Worry Trump Could Tell U.S. Marshals to Stop Protecting Them
If he thought he could get away with this, he’d do it to keep judges dependent on him for protection, similar to a protection racket you might say which is right up his alley as a thug just like his attempts at extortion with other countries is. Providing Marshals Service protection for judges is the law, however shrinking the Marshals Service like every other agency they’ve been doing would come easy to tRump if he thought too many judges rubbed him the wrong way and he wanted to inflict some kind of payback or retribution.
. Although we are now polarized, we’re not ideologically, clultishly polarized in the way the US electorate is. Nor are we hate-mongering the ‘others’ among us. Wanted to point that out.