Now that the bipartisan infrastructure plan has been fully defined and delineated, the mad scramble for advocacy groups to get their priorities into the reconciliation vehicle begins in earnest.
leaving it to the parliamentarian to remove whatever elements she deems incompatible
Why is this a question? First rule of situations like this is to add extra stuff for the parliamentarian to remove, leaving you with what you wanted in the first place.
As King Solomon once observed, if you know the person is in a situation where they will make the mistake of trying to split the baby, then you have to lard that baby up with realistic-looking prosthetics so it makes it through the procedure unscathed.
Shorter version: The Senate is a ridiculous farce foisted on us by a bunch a slave owners to preserve slavery. It must be dissolved and the House uncapped.
I, for one, demand that Ron Johnson be allowed to testify. Let him come forward, bring his evidence, and explain this plot by the FBI. We have a right to know! Now if he shows up with a bunch of unsubstantiated babble, it’s off to the Red Queen. Lying to the public should have costs.
Any Dem that suggests passing the ‘bipartisan bill’ without the reconciliation piece needs to get primaried.
I am 1000% behind junking the ‘bipartisan bill’ if this bill doesn’t get done. And I doubt a single member of the progressive caucus would lose their seat for doing so.