The Texas lawmaker sponsoring a sweeping effort to give the state unprecedented new powers to enforce the border says that his proposal is about a few things only: fentanyl, the cartels, and saving money.
I ran an industrial hydraulic repair facility back in the 80s. I look at that wall and see a hydraulic jack easily opening it up in minutes. It’s laughably useless.
We don’t understand, because Texas says we don’t, that taxpayer money is being used to pay for a wall that means nothing except to the folks that are building the walls.
These find folks, the builders, will use the profits to recycle the money to buy their favorite politician who will use taxpayer money to get reelected.
Roberto Lopez of the Texas Civil Rights Project described it to TPM as a potential way to allow local militias, who already play in informal role in policing the border, operate under color of law. That, Lopez remarked, would be another way to defray costs.
“That way they can send home the Department of Public Safety troopers and the state national guard, and the only way to do that is by having some sort of mechanism to recruit people,” he said.
There has never been a shortage of people eager to follow someone’s blueprints for ruining people’s lives.
Given the threat to their burial grounds and other sacred sites, I believe the Tohono O’odham would concur.
Also, east of their land, there are some right formidable mountains; the idea of a wall literally running “from sea to shining sea” (or whatever TFeloniousG said) struck me as problematic.
And one of the pretexts is false. Fentanyl, though originating in Mexico is mostly brought in by US Citizens, at ports of entry, not migrants schlepping it across the the desert. Even the CATO institute agrees.