Last month at a train wreck press conference, acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney attempted to shrug off evidence of the Trump administration trying to leverage military aid to force Ukraine to conduct an investigation into a conspiracy theory on the 2016 election that Trump routinely disseminates.
Someone should ask Mulvaney for a list of other countries Trump has personally pressured to fight corruption, and a list of other individuals Trump has personally advocated to have investigated by foreign governments.
So I guess they are going to say that Trump’s call was normal and legitimate and try to undermine the credibility of every single witness the Dems bring forward. Sure sounds like the defensive strategy of a very guilty person.
I can’t believe I’m writing this next phrase, but in fairness to Mulvaney, he probably meant to insert into the public consciousness the notion that “quid pro quos” happen all the time in foreign policy generally.
That is without a doubt correct, and also a distraction.
Do foreign policy “quid pro quos” normally involve the personal interests of a US president? No.
Mulvaney is someone who detests most federal spending, remember his rant against meals on wheels. So its obvious that he wasn’t crazy about releasing the aid. That and sucking up to Trump made a stupid and lethal combination.
Like the murder of Kashoggi. All real Americans have saws and power tools in their garage to work on wholesome American projects. Therefore, using tools to remove something you don’t like so it will fit while being carried out the door in pieces is perfectly reasonable and everybody does that.
Nixon sabotaging the Paris Peace Talks and Reagan sabotaging negotiations to free the Iranian hostages don’t count because they were just candidates at the time.