Signature Audit GA Republicans Claim To Want Is Fruitless — But Convenient

In recent days, Georgia Republicans have quickly coalesced behind calling for a “signature audit” to address the fabricated ills of the November election. 


This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://talkingpointsmemo.com/?p=1348193
1 Like

A signature audit would be fruitless, and Republicans likely know it.

Do Republicans know anything any more? They emote. They act indignantly. They get the vapors about Socialism. They unload stock and check their account in the Caymans. Knowledge, not so much.

11 Likes

More of the same. Just keep pushing that button, dumbfucks.

12 Likes

“If you put as much effort into the January runoffs as you have put on blaming others for your failures, we can’t lose.”

Maybe not Brad, but you should. If you weren’t so busy deluding yourself about who and what your party stands for you’d say as much.

5 Likes

I’ve understand beating a dead horse is pointless, fruitless. That its carcass simply will not run any faster.

“If only we could enter it in the Preakness,” Rethugliklans say. “It’d be a sure bet!”

Hi ho. And so it goes.

A dog barked somewhere.

12 Likes

That is the new “Long Form Birth Certificate”

15 Likes

The whole game is asking for something because it implies that there was a problem that what you are asking for would address, and then not getting what you ask for (like you know you wouldn’t) so that the denial of what you asked for means that the problem not only existed but is being covered up and allowed to stand.

False, baseless, evidence-free attacks on the integrity of an election should be made a form of election fraud. Especially since this is nothing but a bunch of racists yelling n-bombs in a crowded polling booth.

14 Likes

States writes?

1 Like

Fruitless, but convenient.

Don’t @ me. And I fully expect this to be disappeared by the powers that be (or discobot).

ETA Dog owners will understand.

19 Likes

Kemp, former SoS for GA seems to be a bit confused about the voting process in his own state.

Voter signatures have been checked, twice in some cases, but here we get to the meat of their arguement:

Once the election worker verifies the signatures, the envelope with the signature and ballot inside are separated. That is in keeping with the state constitution, which mandates that the state’s voters cast “secret ballots.”

Is a judge really going to breach the secrecy of the voting booth, (you know what I mean)?

And if they can’t have all mailed in votes checked, by them watching the checkers, then they’d settle for 10,000? Does the judge get to pick the 10,000 out the pile of mail in votes?

Hey Brad when Kemp had your job and enacted “exact match” how many votes did he toss? Did you have to follow the same regulations on “exact match” as he did? If so how many did you toss. And while we’re on the topic of “exact match” how many Georgians “cured” their official state signatures?

And for shits and giggles how many votes in the 2020 election were rejected? How many in 2018, 2016? How many accepted votes were cast in 2020, 2018, 2016?

10 Likes

Is that Chi-hoo-ah-hoo-ah a Russian hooker?

3 Likes

Dunno, but it seems to be a-pee-sing him.

6 Likes

A Trump Hump?

3 Likes

Who’s a good boy! Who’s a good boy!

11 Likes

A lot of fuming and fussing going on. Fighting? I’m now starting to doubt it for perhaps the first time.

6 Likes

The judge could invalidate the ballots in proportion to the statewide vote, which would be as logical and as pointless as the lawsuit itself.

4 Likes

Actually, that pooch bears a striking resemblance to Lindsey Graham.

Just sayin’.

5 Likes

Heard this years ago from a coworker of mine, ex-Navy. Said that, as a freshly commissioned (read: “wet behind the ears”) ensign on his first ship, his section chief very quickly made him understand that his main priority, when any work was being done, was to stay the heck out of the way of the chief and crew doing the actual work.

But, to satisfy the typical desire to do something, the chief had mounted a pushbutton in a convenient (read “out of the crew’s way”) place, and called it the ensign button. Any time the ensign felt the need to do something to help out, he was welcome to push the button.

The button wasn’t connected to anything, didn’t do anything. But he could push it as many times as he wanted to.

11 Likes

They all seem like little children – similar to Trump – who just stomp their feet and throw hissy-fits when things don’t go their way. Honestly, these republicans at least, belong nowhere near government. They lack the maturity and self control.

5 Likes

More winning.

19 Likes