Originally published at: SCOTUS Hears Oral Arguments In Birthright Citizenship Case, With Consequences For Courts’ Ability To Check Trump - TPM – Talking Points Memo
The Supreme Court is hearing arguments this morning on what’s outwardly a case about President Donald Trump’s attempt to restrict birthright citizenship. But on the substance, the arguments will delve into a different topic: the power of district courts to issue orders that take effect nationally, halting federal policy. Three separate district court judges issued…
Question for the Justices: Does it matter whether the conduct being enjoined violates the Constitution, or a law passed by Congress? It should matter, no?
If Coca Cola is dumping carcinogens in its sodas nationwide, an injunction that only applies in the Northern District of Iowa seems kind of inadequate.
Sotomayor is not having any of Sauer’s argument. Oh man and she is using the 2nd amendment as an example.
I was born in Santa Monica, California. That should be all that’s needed to claim my citizenship.
“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”
Sauer speaking style is so fast that it is annoying.
The fundamental problem with nationwide injunctions against the federal government based on federal law is that sometimes they get issued by shitty judges like Matthew Kacsmaryk. That’s a problem for appeal, not an excuse for this terrible Supreme Court to wipe its ass with the Federal Rules of Civil/Appellate Procedure.
That this terrible Supreme Court can resolve cases expeditiously when it wants to elides the fact that it is also perfectly comfortable ignoring shitty lower court rulings when it suits the Sicko Six’s political and cultural agenda.
All this legalese is getting confusing. How about we simplify this type of decision-making to whoever buys Thomas the most expensive RV wins. /s
Per Chief Joker Roberts, it’s the fault of the lack of civic education among today’s youths.
Uncle Thomas cannot be bought for a mere RV.
It takes a flying pimpmobile these days.
HA! HA! Kagan went there! She asked why this is coming to the Supreme Court when they are LOSING in all of the previous courts! LOSERS!!
Touche.
If Trump gets a gilded 747, then Thomas can’t settle for anything less than an upscale Gulfstream or Bombardier. Perish the thought that anything except real Corinthian leather could touch the backside of a Supreme Court Justice on his way to a yacht adventure with his billionaire bestie.
I might add or Supreme Court orders as well.
Sauer Won’t Tell ACB That Admin Will Respect Circuit Court Orders
But title will remain in the name of Harlan Crow, so it’s all above-board.
Gotta keep up with Cabinet Secretaries getting new Gulfstreams.
On cue: Kristi wants US tax payers to buy her a new Gulfstream 5.
“My committee just received a last-minute addition to the Coast Guard’s spend plan: $50 million for a new Gulfstream 5 jet for DHS Secretary Kristi Noem’s personal use,” Illinois Rep. Lauren Underwood said Wednesday. “She already has a Gulfstream 5, by the way, but she wants a new one paid for with your taxpayer dollars.”
Canada, Mexico, are you listening? Might be a great way to get tariffs reduced.
And who knows… if there were to be an unfortunate an engine problem…