Wow. A lot of ink here for Joe Scarbrough. Would be nice to see this much effort (and length) in an article about what any one of our candidates is saying, about anything.
Scarborough’s repeated histrionics on “Morning Joe” are starting to get the best of him. Some of the others on the “Morning Joe” panel seem to strain to stop rolling their eyes at his emotionalism and interruptions.
Sure, by all means, serious American journalists should jump all over Scarborough for tweeting something “irresponsible”, and condemn “someone with a platform and voice as large as yours” rather than clown-wigged, raccoon-faced orange blobs of syphilitic man-babies with their itchy fingers on the launch codes, because, G-d knows, there are SERIOUS CONSEQUENCES from a morning cable host tweetering something.
There is nothing wrong with Scarborough’s initial reaction nor his clarification. The expression “tries to clean up” does not do justice to the clarification.
Secondly, the person responsible (head of the DOJ), William Barr, is not recusing himself from further investigation of what is a highly suspicious “suicide”.
OT I know all about Scarborough…but this story dilutes the good that the initial Scarborough reaction did
I must’ve been the only person to take it as Joe suggesting that since Trump admires Putin so much it appeared to him to be the way a Putin critic might ‘have an accident’ or ‘throw himself out that window, we could not stop him’ that sort of thing.
So I did not think he was saying The Russians Dunnit but that this mysterious death fit a ‘Russian pattern.’
I’m having trouble seeing why Scarborough should be on the defensive about this. Epstein’s death was incredibly suspicious and, if by “Russian,” Scarborough simply meant unbelievably corrupt and, possibly, a result of orders coming from the top, he might be right.
On the other hand, if by “Russian,” Scarborough was implying that Putin might have directly played a hand in Epstein’s death, well that’s crazy. Putin would never order anyone killed. And why would Putin have any interest in our politics anyway?
Oh, and Glen Greenwald is a total POS as well as a Russian troll.
I can believe Glenn Greenwald is a Russian tool but do you happen to ‘know’ that he is a POS? I just remember him saying that it totally WAS possible that Seth Rich leaked the Podesta emails to WikiLeaks (somehow after he died) and that appeared to be wishful thinking. But I just want to know if he ‘is’ a big ol’ jerk. (I gather he moved to Brazil with his Brazilian husband because he feared our government would go after him legally for some of the stuff he was doing. I wonder if he now finds Brazil less welcoming with the new Rightist government?)
All a bunch of inside “journalism” baseball. Easy target for Greenwald, who nets himself some publicity while showing that he’s not a journalist any more than Scarborough is. Bunch of hacks doing it for the advertising.