Lawyers for 2020 Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore are arguing new claims that Moore “likely failed” a polygraph test about whether he sexually assaulted a teenager are just a “publicity stunt” on behalf of the accuser.
Maybe Moore and Epstein can form a joint defense agreement.
So Moore’s lawyers are admitting that the state of Alabama is not well versed in modern technology.
to discredit the examiner’s findings of innocence,”
How dumb do they think the voters of Alabama are? Nobody has found Roy Moore “innocent,” since he hasn’t gone to trial.
Naw. A publicity stunt would be the Gadsden Mall putting up a giant sign that read:
Still 100% Roy Moore Free!
Name Roy’s horse and take 10% OFF!*
*$100 minimum purchase
Why is Mr. Moore still calling himself Judge Moore even though he was removed from the Court for misconduct? Doing so is clearly a publicity stunt.
Twice!
You know what’s the greatest publicity stunt of all time? Being crucified. Moore should try it.
This filing is the equivalent of “pounding the table”.
“The recent motion about Judge Moore’s 2017 polygraph exam is posturing at its finest lacking all probative value.”
That’s a good point, because, as we all know, Roy Moore has only reprobative values.
Odd… They release snippets of the results to bolster their case in the filing, but don’t seem to want to release the whole thing…
Moore’s lawyer is gunning to be Ivanka’s AG?
Who would have figured?
It’s a corollary to the Bill Barr short summary approach to legal argument.
I wonder whether Roy Moore “dated” Iwanka? That may explain why the Preshitident Skanky-Manslut and Iwanka went out of their way to neighboring states like Florida to campaign for Roy Moore?
Sassy!
Do I get 10% off my tpm renewal?
Dunno. Have you tried asking @discobot display help?
Hate the loser. Love the loss.
Indeed.
“This irrelevant polygraph sideshow is a publicity stunt by the plaintiff
Oh, you mean the polygraph that your client himself brought up to “prove” his “innocence”?
They seem to call it “posturing”, a “publicity stunt”, and more. Notably, however, and revealingly, nowhere do they claim that Corfman’s statement about the polygraph is actually – hmm, what’s the word? Oh yeah – false.
Its also an ethical violation.