Reports: Trump Intends To Nominate Amy Coney Barrett To Supreme Court

Republican was not the word I was thinking but hey it is a family audience here so cool.

3 Likes

While Ruth is Still lying in State on the Capitol. What a POS.

15 Likes

spitballing here…but I’d guess she would be in line with most pro-corporate right wingers;
“corporations are people”
“people were made, by god, for corporations”
“the environment is for corporations”
“clean-up, if any is permitted, is for others to pay for” [privatize profits, socialize costs]
“reliance on god”
“prayer in schools”
“taxes to pay for church schools”
“vouchers, hell, straight up defunding…”
“science is the devil”
“the bibble is the only truth”

rather than continue this…
Why have hearings, anyway?
They’ll stonewall or lie right to your face.
Republicans don’t fucking care. At all.

2 Likes

Ghoulish, isn’t it? RBG hasn’t even been allowed the dignity of her final rest. You’d think the Democrats would be highlighting how disrespectful this mad rush really is.

10 Likes

Her eyes bear an upsetting resemblance to Michelle Bachmann.

19 Likes

…and you saw what happened to Obama when he put Merritt Garland’s name up for nomination.

I think it selective, incomplete to hindsight this particular call without keeping the above in mind.

6 Likes

Two questions:

Where will the handmaid sit while the court is in session?

If we have nine justices and a handmaid, how will a 5-5 tie be broken?

McConnell would have blocked any Obama nominee.

13 Likes

V.o: “previously on ‘2016’.”

where was I?

5 Likes

That’s the tell. Like Bachman. Ginny Fox, Gohmert…

they may be using religion for political purposes, but they are also believers.

The eyes tell all, CrazyTown.

Falwell didn’t have 'em

Joel Osteen doesn’t

Because they are simple con men.

5 Likes

For those wondering, she’s the Clarence Thomas of women jurists…replacing a major liberal figure of the same race/sex with a crass opportunist with questionable skills or understanding of the law, willing to twist it to get the result they want, and uninterested in ruling based on the Constitution or helping people. So, perfect for Republicans…

This 6-3 court is just setting up a revolt against them, you can bet they will continually rule against centrist Democratic policies that are popular with everyone (say, access to birth control, or background checks for gun purchases), and overextend their rulings beyond the scope of the case, always ruling in a way that pushes their ideology and hurts people while helping religions, the wealthy and businesses. A few of those decisions (the ACA repeal being the first), and people will rebel, Democrats will remove their power through legislation, and Democratic presidents will ignore their decisions.

In whatever way, this court will end the legitimacy of the Supreme Court…Roberts has worked very hard to try to make it legitimate as it undid many protections for people, and he largely succeeded. Now, we’ll see what happens when the people who have been pushing to foist a right wing court, and their bent towards theocracy and dominion by conservatives, get their way and overplay their hand in their haste to undo democracy and freedoms for any non-white, non-evangelical Americans.

23 Likes

They are getting ready to erase every single things she stood for. Just watch.

3 Likes

The woman is batshit crazy. They should play this video in her face at the hearing:

And then spend their time grilling her on her idiocy about the 14th Amendment being void and what the result would be for about half this country if the SCOTUS overturned it based on her fucking retarded doublethink pretzel of a theory.

13 Likes

Even if there’s some big new allegation against her like Dr Ford’s attempted rape allegation against Kavanaugh, the GOP would still rush to confirm Barrett and wouldn’t delay anything. At this point, they’d be fine if there was video evidence of her blowing up a cruise ship filled with White pregnant Texan women.

While GOP senators could see their poll numbers go down from their hypocrisy back home, I have to doubt that would even have an effect on confirmation at this point since they don’t want to piss off their base by not going through with the confirmation.

Only way this can be stalled is if Pelosi calls for impeachment repeatedly and forces 51 GOP Senators on the floor when they’d rather be campaigning.

6 Likes

Kennedy did nearly 30 yrs, and Ginsburg did nearly 29, but please continue.

Regarding a trial, the Senate calls the tune. #pleasecontinue

4 Likes

Not in 2012 or 2013. True, we could never know but it would have been easier to replace a liberal justice appointed by a democrat with another liberal justice appointed by a democrat. Replacing Kennedy (appointed by a republican) with Garland was not the same situation.

1 Like

Have we learned a lesson about wielding power yet?

4 Likes

“Post deleted.”

I am not expecting there to be a hearing. So nobody will question this nutty extremist.

2 Likes
Comments are now Members-Only
Join the discussion Free options available