House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) reportedly wants Democrats to keep a narrow scope on their impeachment inquiry efforts.
This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://talkingpointsmemo.com/?p=1251537
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) reportedly wants Democrats to keep a narrow scope on their impeachment inquiry efforts.
Gotta keep them focused, there are so many trails they could follow.
Iâm withholding judgement until george weighs in.
Just donât miss
This sounds right to me. Part of the problem with Mueller was too many moving pieces: the scale of corruption was too big for our media culture to digest.
it shouldnât be to difficult to charge him with obstruction of justice as well, both on the Ukraine episode and the Mueller investigation for starters.
WTF? Has she lost it?
It has the advantage that Trump already admitted to using the power of his office to âencourageâ a foreign government to dig up dirt on a political opponent. It has the disadvantage that that is all that is going to come out of it, and Republicans already say that they are cool with it, and the American public doesnât seem to grasp the immensity of the action.
Correct. You donât swing at every single pitch, and this needs to be focused and to the point in order to get done in a timely manner.
Itâs the right decision. Itâs clear, itâs simple, and Trump has admitted to the charge in public. More than once now.
As much as Iâd like to see every known and suspected misdeed included to tell the full story, the criminal activity can be handled by SDNY and a post-Trump DOJ. It will all come out eventually.
Sheâs got the goods, I reckon.
If you go after the King you better kill the King. Easier to follow the trajectory of one clean shot.
Blood in the waterâŚthe area has been chummed and sheâs moving in.
ETA: Theyâre gonna need a bigger boat.
I am 100% in support of this. One of the key problems stemming from the Mueller Report is that the subject matter was so damned complicated. People couldnât follow it. I donât think I could follow it, and I hold myself in relatively high intellectual esteem.
âTrump said âDo me a favor, investigate my political opponentââ
Thatâs easy. Thatâs straightforward. Just do that. Impeachment is a political matter, not a law enforcement matter. You donât have to nail 'em for everything. Youâre not saying âthis conduct is okay actuallyâ.
All those other charges ainât going anywhere. Save 'em. We can snack on them later. In the courts. When we donât have to deal with the âindicting sitting presidentsâ bullshit.
Good with this.
I think ultimately it comes down to convincing the public. If you have 10 different threads it allows the GOP to pick the least convincing one and pretend it is the entire case. There is only so much bandwith the public is willing to process.
This is the most recent and easy to understand for voters. I support this.
She empowered six different committees to perform their own impeachment inquiries. Those committees each have wildly different jurisdiction. If she wanted it limited to the Ukraine thing â which would be pretty dumb considering that things like emoluments/self-dealing and his tax returns are also hugely corrupt and easy to sell â then sheâs going about it all wrong.
Remember, these idiots thought that that phone call memo was exonerating for Trump. How bad do you think the stuff is that that they are going to court to withhold from those committees?
Wow. And Fat Donnie thinks heâs good at the slow reveal.