The Senate Judiciary Committee released a sweeping, 400-page report on Thursday delving into former President Trump’s attempts to wield the Justice Department to subvert the 2020 election.
But did they say anything about Hunter’s laptop or Hillary’s emails? Yet nothing but crickets from the cowards known as GQP. I didn’t see Senator Cuck Grassley’s name on the report. Either he was at home delivering the Twitter corn report or he is nothing but a coward as well. Joni Ernst always was worse than worthless. This report is about the criminal that the GOP Senate, including Grassley and Ernst refused to convict in the impeachment. Even now Grassley refuses the truth and seeks to recruit followers for the criminal. We’re not safe with dotard Grassley in the Senate.
@kelaine
See! You get it! Why, oh why can’t everyone else! My pastor’s brother’s mechanic posted about this on Facebook. Everyone knows! Why won’t they DO SOMETHING!
Sooooo does anything happen now as a result, or just more under reacting about how close it “was” while Trump’s flying monkeys work out the kinks for next time?
“…while the National Archives have yet to supply the panel with documents.”
Isn’t the National Archives part of the executive branch? What’s with the foot dragging?
I’m glad this is out there, but something like this should be shocked, front-page headlines. I see it being played as a second story on NYT, CNN and WaPo. It’s nowhere on Foxnews.com, of course. (And now I have to disinfect my computer for going there.)
I worry that, much like the rest of these necessary hearings, it’s going to be lost. Maybe things will turn when people find out that Dan Scavino is hiding in Brazil or something to avoid the subpoena.
Remember when we were told that Trump liked to tear up any printed documents? And the NA had to hire/assign a team of people to piece back together what Trump tore to bits?
And part of the delay is that in the process it is baked into someone challenging the request, which means the committee has to allot time for challenge to be presented, and if you’re dealing with a bunch of fuck wads they string this along as long as they can.
They won’t change. Ever. They are corrupted by money and the lust for power (okay, in Grassley’s case, the lust for pidgins). True progress only occurs when the old fuckers die off.
It’s great the Senate Judiciary Committee issued a report detailing the corrupt efforts of the Trump regime and its DOJ lackeys to steal the 2020 election. I’m sure this’ll be great reading for historians.
Here’s the real question: what will be the legal consequences? Is DOJ working on indicting Trump and his lackeys for these corrupt acts? Surely a conspiracy to steal the election is illegal under multiple federal laws?
Hey Merrick Garland — what does this mean? While there has been a recent oblique hint DOJ is investigating Trump, are they? (Recently Garland refused to answer a question about Trump, claiming he can’t speak to ongoing investigations of persons).
I’m a lawyer, and I understand the need for patience, but why can’t DOJ indict Trump for the many crimes that are known? (Obstruction of justice and witness tampering with Russia and Ukraine investigations and election finance violations with the use of campaign money to silence Stormey Daniels). Later indictments can be issued for other crimes.