Re his odds in luck of the draw on the judge. Current makeup of the DC District Court:
9-4 D-R active appointees
7-6 D-R senior appointees
I do not know if this case can go to a senior judge.
12 Likes
Gotta keep it in court. Any court. If itās in court, Iām not guilty of anything. Okay. How. How. A suit. I need a suit. Start a whole different judicial process. Cut myself. Oh yeah. A nice, clean cut.
Iām free.
9 Likes
Nothing says youāre guilty quite like hiding the evidence that ties you to the crime.
29 Likes
I think one thing weāve noticed pretty consistently is that the Supreme Court, even with the nakedly political justices Trump appointed sitting on it, isnāt inclined to give him his rattle every time he cries. Theyāve repeatedly stiff-armed him on this kind of thing. And the question of executive privilege as it applies to non-current leaders of the executive branch regarding matters typically not covered by that privilege seems to have been addressed as well. So this is a punk move from a punk, long story short. Glad we could clear that up.
54 Likes
This. I literally LOLād.
Bitch must be scared.
26 Likes
What is being proven is that there is simply no way to punish an attempt to subvert the democratic system, the culprits (I am talking of the real instigators and conspirators, not the Shaman idiots ) and their allies in the court are going to delay things long enough until the republicans regain the majority (and they will because Americans are either nasty and/or stupid), so all investigations will be dropped and the DOJ will not dare to investigate them.
So they will be ready to do it all over again in 2024 if things donāt go their way.
4 Likes
Because Meadows is, by every definition including the US penal system one, a punk.
14 Likes
Probably not, as long as they back it up with some precedent or evidence. I will note that of the 60-something election fraud lawsuits, only 3 of them have resulted in sanctions. Courts donāt like to sanction if thereās any grey area at all.
8 Likes
Nope. Nothing that came after that has been proven or is in the process of being proven. This facile cynicism is a) not supported by the facts and b) not helping. Iāve already said once today that going after Meadows et al. shows where theyāre aiming. Itās not rocket surgery.
30 Likes
or you canāt be honest and upfront despite saying you are honest. Ya know, I refuse to answer your questions though I have nothing to hide.
3 Likes
Is this Terwilliger the IIIās doing? It seems more like a Sidney Powell move.
6 Likes
Is he arguing that what the committee is asking is illegal or that it ought to be illegal and the courts should make it so? I thought Rās always complained about activist judges legislating from the bench.
12 Likes
Sideshow Bobās the first attorney on the filing.
7 Likes
40 Likes
Pretty on-brand for McGuire Woods.
2 Likes
L O fucking L!
3 Likes
You go to court with the idiot you have, not the idiots you wish you had.
36 Likes
Unless he gets Neomi Rao, heās fucked six ways from Sunday.
No other federal judge is going to do much besides laugh at the brazenness and stupidity in this lawsuit.
24 Likes
LOL. The clown parade continues to demonstrate that these folks are nothing but cowards and traitors.
Cowards and traitors to the bone
(oh, and fascists).
8 Likes
Not sure this is even hiding the evidence. Itās more like he threw the gun off the bridge, but did it in the middle of a parade carried live on television. All the while screaming that theyāll never get their hands on the fingerprints now.
15 Likes