I want to know if the book really confirms that he is incontinent, as I have read.
More like the Today Show.
Is that the office whose cavalier approach to masking was featured in a recent article?
It is hard reading cross examination from inexperienced litigators, ending each leading question with āCorrect?ā Nadler does this every time. When I defend depositions from new lawyers who do the exact same thing I know Iām in for a long, tedious day. And especially asking questions to adduce testimony that is already in the recordā¦ Reminds me of Dogberry in Much Ado About Nothing.
I donāt get it. You are saying Castor is a moron?
Yes I am. Without a doubt. I meant by opening his mouth, he confirmed heās a moron. Any decent lawyer knows the answer heās likely going to get before he asks the question.
House Dems trying to push the subpoena issue.
https://twitter.com/stevenmazie/status/1282863074974879744?s=21
BREAKING: House Democrats ask SCOTUS to accelerate issuance of ruling in the Trump subpoena cases to permit timely re-litigation in the lower courts
āThe House is planning to quickly revisit its effort to obtain President Donald Trumpās personal financial records, urging the Supreme Court on Monday night to take its final formal steps on the matter so lawmakers can reignite the issue in the lower courts,ā Politico reported.
āIn a filing late Monday, the Houseās top lawyer, Douglas Letter, urged the justices to immediately effectuate their July 9 ruling on the Houseās subpoena for Trumpās records. Once the ruling is in force, the House can return to the U.S. District Court judge who initially heard the case and ask for renewed consideration,ā Politico explained. āBut Supreme Court rulings typically donāt go into force immediately, and Letter noted that the Mazars ruling would normally take effect on Aug. 3 without the intervention of the justices. The lower courts canāt begin to take up the effort until the Supreme Court ruling takes hold, and the House is urging the justices to make that happen as quickly as possible.ā
It seemed to me that he answered a ton of questions without actually answering them. Iām also concerned that within a week or two, we might find out that Audrey Strauss has āresignedā and/or been replaced by a different āactingā official.
If that happens, then I think we can safely assume that a full-blown coverup of something is in full swing.
Dust off that Impeachment machine and crank it back up. Chump and Barr this time please.
I suggest adding a couple of words:
we can safely assume that another gargantuan full-blown coverup of something is in full swing.
Agreed and safely assumedā¦
I am not a Lawyerā¦so I am speculatingā¦but this is tangentially related to the idea of some people being institutionalists
-
I have seen it with Neal Katyal (sic?), speaking of SCOTUSās āprofessionalismā
-
I have seen it with the formidable RBG, who spoke favorably about Brett Kavanaugh
-
And we have certainly seen it with Mueller
ā¦Maybe Berman is simply being an institutionalist and careful to hedge on Barrā¦so far, anyway.
Andā¦how about we end this crazy day with Bolsonaro bitten by an emu? I hope that poor emuās okay.
https://twitter.com/domphillips/status/1282859961006141441?s=21
I can top that!
Houston PD are applauded for their handling of a disarmed knife-wielding suspect-- asking for and receiving citizensā assistance during the physical portion of restraining said suspect.
Thatās a fantastic story, better than mine, but mine has an emu! An Australian bird that somehow got to Brazil.
Emus (Ema?) have been making a comeback recently!
One-- who made it al the way to Hollywood! ā«āŖ
Heās slimy, thatās for sure. E.g., trying to get Berman to reveal his communications from counsel. Amateur move with a guy like Berman.
Theyāre condensed under āinject disinfectantā, right in the middle.
Apparently it was actually a rhea (called ema in Portugese), the South American relative of the emu.