The Justice Department responded to a blistering critique of its conduct in the Michael Flynn case on Wednesday, calling its decision to drop charges against the former national security adviser an “unreviewable exercise of prosecutorial discretion.”
The law is really clear here. The federal rules allow review by the Court for “good cause” and the reason why this rule exists - and the supreme court changed the prior rule - was because of examples of selective prosecution/political interference.
The history is clear.
So DOJ just going in and making wild claims is not only NOT going to help them with the Court, he is going to take it as further evidence that misconduct occurred. Put another way, if there was a reasonable explanation for what DOJ did, they would not be arguing it was not reviewable.
My guess is that the Court just sentences Flynn to jail, then issues an Order to show cause why DOJ should not be investigated by the Court for false statements.
P.s. Here is the law review article which lays out why DOJ is wrong:
…an “unreviewable exercise of prosecutorial discretion.”
So, along with the concept of the unitary executive who cannot be held accountable for anything, FUBarr also believes his authority also cannot be questioned.
I was thinking this morning “I wonder what’s going on in the rest of the world?” since domestic affairs are so overwhelming. I was surprised to read that Indian and Chinese soldiers are killing each other with clubs and rocks in the Himalayas.
So what I take the DOJ is doing is saying we can change any plea, any verdict we damn well please at any time we want and you can’t do a damn thing about it. Seems that is ripe for cash to change hands and another method for Turnip and Company to line pockets.