Okay, six… 
4 Likes
Much much better. I knew you had it in you!
4 Likes
If I put a fertilized single cell human egg in a petri dish and flood it with a lethal dose of alcohol, can the anti-woman states charge and try me for homicide? Or perhaps charge and try me for giving alcohol to a minor? Could they perhaps charge the sperm donor for the experiment with rape? Inquiring minds want to know.
It costs about $250,000 to raise a child to 18 in the United States. The bright lights of the anti-woman movement want to force women to carry unwanted pregnancies to term, and they say they will support her during that time because the “life” she carries is sacred. There’s two things, at least, wrong there, besides forcing a woman to bend to their will (fat old white men like doing that in their wet dreams). For one, when the woman finally gives birth to a baby she can’t afford, and who will live in poverty because for whatever reason she can’t make enough money to support the child, the same anti-woman crowd will crucify her and make her life an even worse hell, and not a bit of useful support will they give. (Oh, they’ll give thoughts and prayers. Ever eat a thought or a prayer? Ever pay rent with a thought or a prayer?) For another thing, let’s dispense with the idea that human life, in any form, size, age or shape, is sacred. Look around. Nothing sacred about it. We slaughter each other every day by the hundreds and thousands. We treat people like dirt if they aren’t the same color as us, or speak a different language, or eat different foods, or whatever the hell. Look at the vile way the anti-woman crowd treats women who need or want to end a pregnancy. They’re the same crowd that tell women their rape is their fault, that incest is their fault, that beatings at the hands of scumbag men is their fault. The churches, of all denominations, who tell us life is sacred have a long history of slaughtering and torturing humans, including children. So when these anti-woman babblers say life is sacred, I can never decide whether to laugh out loud or spit in their faces. Let’s face it, the anti-woman crowd aren’t doing this anti-abortion gig because they believe life is sacred, no, they’re doing it because it gives them a sense of power and it allows them to demean, degrade, and humiliate women without having to actually beat them up. And the women in that crowd, they’re just sad and pathetic. And sort of vicious. Judas at least made thirty pieces of silver. These women get for their betrayal of women’s health care, of women’s freedom, nothing but power over other women. As for what to do about all this, y’all remember the verses about 'First they came for the socialists and I did not speak out because I was not a socialist"? Remember that? Well you had better raise your voices and get out into the streets and besiege your local, state, and Federal politicians, because these bastards are coming for you, for your family, for your friends, for our country. Count on it, motherfucker, count on it!
5 Likes
So - does SCOTUS take aim at Loving v. Virginia in the near future? Odd how that one didn’t make Clarence’s hit list.
That man is odious.
2 Likes
Isn’t it though?
Even though the same constitutional theory (substantive due process) that undergirds Loving is what undergirds Roe, Obergefell, Lawrence, and all the others Thomas caterwauls about in his bullshit opinion in Dodd, as being wrongly adjudicated.
1 Like
What a bunch of dung.
Yeah it’s all the Democrats fault.
GFY.
2 Likes
You’re part of the problem. Just keep going to that same old dried up well.
You GFY too.
Actually, what I think she has done is declare herself the leader of the “Reborn Republican” party (or maybe they’re going to go with something like the Lincoln Party to capture all those good vibes). Whatever they call it, she’s absolutely positioned herself front and center as the leader of the “Non Crazy Conservatives” (so, will “NCC” become a thing in the next cycle to let them distance themselves from the “Truly Batshit Regressives” or “TBR”?)
I will willingly concede that the future is completely obscured by fog and noise, but assuming we do survive as a country then the TBR folks will have to be gone, ceding their side of the field to the NCC folks going forward.
As a betting man (hint, I have a math degree so I don’t bet) my money would be on the NCC folks, but then I’ve been told I have a chemical imbalance of the brain that leads to unwarranted and irrational optimism… 
3 Likes
Wrong. You’re the problem since the only way to fix this (near and long term) is to elect more pro-choice filibuster reform Democrats). To the Senate and House.
But your pathetic “both sides suck” attitude and views are why we lost in 2016 and why Roe is gone.
Congratulations troll.
3 Likes
Wrong. Why haven’t Democrats codified Roe when they have had ample opportunities to do so with all of those pro-choice Democrats you speak of? I am very happy with the Democrats I get to vote for here in California. Those are the kind of Democrats that I will precinct walk and phone bank for. Too bad there aren’t more of them in other states.
But honestly, I am sick to death of cozy, clueless fools like you who say “when they go low, we go high” (i.e. Merrick Garland), or "you just gotta vote harder. Keep punching the air you dangerously out of touch fool, see where that gets you. I guess you’ll have buff arms in the Gilead era. Oh and your smug self righteousness.
I hope this next election can be won overwhelmingly but given the systematic suppression of the vote, the unhinged propaganda in so many states, and delusional democrats like you who think that the rules of 30 years ago still apply with fascism, I’m not feeling good.
Yes, having seen your comments it’s quite clear that anyone that has a different view from you is labeled as a “troll.” I’m not that immature but in the meantime I can tell you once again to GFY.
Here’s the thing…Liberals are creative. We will find ways to undermine this Talabanistic “win” that the rightwing zealots think is the end of this fight. We know how to sterilize surgical tools. We know how to smuggle pills across state lines. It may take some time to get the processes up and running, but it will get done!
1 Like
You forget what McConnell did to prevent Obama’s nominee even being considered when RBG died. He would have done the same if she had retired a year earlier. McConnell was laser focused on stacking every court in the land…particularly the Supreme Court. He would never have considered any nominee that a Democrat put forward.
Do not blame RBG. Blame the real villain here…Mitch McConnell who would never have allowed any nominee that was put up by a Democrat to replace her.
I’m not sure that’s true. Democrats had the majority in the senate during Obama’s first two years. That’s when he tried to get her to retire and she declined. It was a mistake. We can’t undo that mistake but we can learn from it. It appears that Breyer did. Good. that’s progress. Stop making excuses.
One thing people in this forum seem incapable of doing is owning mistakes. The Democrats have made a lot of mistakes. The way we grow from those mistakes is by owning them, learning from them, and moving on. But if you dare to point that out here to those who are comfy in their recliner watching baseball games, your head will be ripped off and you’ll be labeled a “troll.”
“This is the right’s war on women, but they’ve been helped by the complacency of establishment Democrats,”
There was no need for Congress to “codify” Roe. It was settled law, just like Brown v. Board, and there was the expectation that subsequent Courts would honor the law. This Court has shown themselves to be rogue “justices” and liars. There is no law that they would not simply declare “unconstitutional” in order to further their rightwing agenda. Make no mistake, it is not the Democrats who are to blame for this. It is the GQP who are totally bent on destroying democracy in the US and turning it into a rightwing Taliban run theocracy.
1 Like
Please stop making excuses. The Democrats could have codified Roe and should have codified Roe. It was clear the ultimate goal of the GQP was to kill Roe since Roe came to be. It’s been clear since 1973! They said they would eventually kill Roe. That danger was always there. The Democrats DO bear some responsibility in this. I’m sorry that you refuse to see that. You’re seem to still be in the denial phase of Elisabeth Kübler Ross stages of grief.
Ah yes, back to “blame the Democrats” with the same tired schtick trolls have been vomiting up for the past week.
But honestly, I am sick to death of cozy, clueless fools like you who say “when they go low, we go high”
I never once said any such thing, clown.
I have always advocated kicking Republicans and conservatives squarely in the balls politically.
So you can keep slaying your strawmen, and once again, and I say this sincerely… go fuck yourself.
Bye.
(mute)
Exactly. You’re clueless. Still playing by the same rules of 30 years ago when the fascists have rewritten the playbook. Keep punching at the air …
My heart is broken that you don’t like me. 
Yeah, thanks. I will henceforth agree with everything you say. Godforbid I have an opinion that differs from YOUR superior wisdom.