Yes, but…
The US Senate will always remain fundamentally “undemocratic” in that representation there has no relationship to population.
As it stands the Senate needs some form of minority caucus safeguards so that when 65% or so of the population might be represented by only 46 Senators or even less, the interests of those 65% cannot be completly ignored.
Small states will never agree to any constitutional amendments to temper their influence in the Senate. Consequently, I am suggesting that there needs to be some form of ability of protecting the interests of the majority of the population that differs from the type of obstructionism we have to deal with today. I confess I do not know what that might be now, but this year and next may be the last chance to figure that out.
When I was younger, many of today’s red states were represented by Democrats (George McGovern-SD, Frank Church-ID, etc.) The ultimate solution may be to take them back, but we have to deal with what we have to deal with now.