The New Mexico Supreme Court took the state GOP’s side Monday in a dispute with New Mexico election officials over how broadly to expand mail-in voting for the state’s upcoming elections due to the pandemic.
Most current info I could find suggests that there are 5 judges, 4 democrats and 1 republican. So not typical GOP voter ratfuckery, I guess, other than the GOP filing an objection?
Quite so! That’s not a reason to ignore statutory mandates. It’s a reason to enact exceptions and exigencies, and the power to do so lies with the legislature, not the local clerk’s office.
This morning, the page with the absentee ballot online application was almost unreachable, I’m assuming from everybody hitting it at about the same time.
Ironically, so was my bank’s website. I’m guessing it was people like myself who wanted to see if they’ve gotten their “stimulus” deposits yet.
And when the Lege is unable to “enact” anything because of the pandemic preventing them from meeting, and their rules preventing them from teleconferencing until they have met to change their rules? Suicide pact! The GOP wins again!
Republicants simply cannot win on a level playing field, and even Resident Rump voiced this within the last week.
To win, they must suppress the vote through any tangled web of lies they can spin, and through any unethical and non-American means they can think of in their struggle to retain minority power.
Yes, it’s more susceptible to fraud, as the North Carolina GOP showed us with their recent Congressional election shenanigans. Much more susceptible than in-person voting with no ID checks (there never was significant opportunity for fraud with in-person voting in the first place).
The GOP loved mail-in voting up until 2020, because the primary users were active service members and people with vacation homes. And because they were the ones who mastered how to harvest ballots from the elderly and change their preferred candidates prior to submittal. Only now, when it seems that a large portion of the electorate will utilize mail-in balloting (and potentially increase the voter participation rate as a result) do they cry foul.
Yeah. Struck me as a ‘split the baby’ decision. You can’t just do it - but we’re going to require the state to send everyone a request to do it. Puts an interim step in the process. Not ideal - but better than Wisconsins clusterfuck