“Couchfuck McGee” I love that!
3 Likes
The medical community does it now on tv and in videos.
“The individuals shown in this program are actors.” …as well as the disclaimer… “Actual patients.”
Musk isn’t worth his wealth. Money isn’t merit.
4 Likes
I do like Schiff’s proposal.
…federally prohibit political campaigns and other political groups from using AI to create deepfakes to misrepresent their rivals or their views.
There is no need for it in politics.
7 Likes
AI has become so powerful. I can use it in my job if a person signs an agreement to allow the use of their voice to be reproduced using AI. It is handy if a VO is needed when the live person is not. I can make anyone say anything if they supply me with a 20-second voice sample. There’s some scary power in being able to do that.
While we’re here, here is an AI-generated image of the 2028 Republican National Convention with a wistful hat-tip to TFG.
3 Likes
Exactly. Thank you.
3 Likes
According to Musk California laws will kill parody because they require parody to be clearly labeled. I seem to remember that post-takeover twitter required that parody accounts (specifically, Musk-parody accounts) be labeled as parody but I guess he thinks that’s different.
8 Likes
So, is that a childless lady cat? 
4 Likes
That’s a private company dictating what people all over the world can say, which is just fine according to propertarians. Very different from the government enforcing rules against fraud for profit. Which is bad according to propertarians.
3 Likes
Are based on two enduring principles, specifically: the time-honored principle of Heads I Win, and the sacred principle of Tails You Lose.
4 Likes
I would not want that cat pissed at me
3 Likes
Men luring underage girls online is free speech. I support Newsom in this - Musk is almost as big a baby as 45*.
4 Likes
Muskeetoes?
2 Likes
‘Hard to be a free speech platform in a state that wants to ban free speech…’ Then get the hell out of California, Leon.
1 Like
Is this really you, yellowbeard?
2 Likes
Thanks, @digital_primitive. I’m bad enough at two-dimensional chess, but the episode obviously made a strong impression on me!
It’s obviously not a first amendment problem because AI do not have first amendment rights. People who repost AI content have no copyright protections or first amendment protections of the artificial speech. I hope that’s the outcome of this.