White House chief of staff Mark Meadows on Sunday found himself in a heated exchange with CNN’s Jake Tapper amid President Trump’s efforts to cripple the U.S. Postal Service.
Putz!
No thank you I will not watch Meadow Muffins at work.
Arggle barggle? Gonna be alot of that.
“Show us the evidence.”
“Well, I’m not gonna tell you, coz it’s a secret and my tongue would fall off.”
Sycophantic shitwarbler.
TODD: You’re conflating things. China may be rooting against Trump, but you don’t seem to have the same evidence [of interference] as Russia
ROBERT O’BRIEN: I don’t think that’s true
T: Then where is it?
RO: We’re not going to release sensitive intel
Besides working to destroy everything that Americans have died to defend, Meadows is also a boor.
Somebody needs to look up the definition of fraud — because it sure ain’t “the absence of evidence”…
And jiggery pokery. Tanker cars full.
Meadows is defending someone’s campaign who is committing election fraud as he falsely accuses others of mail fraud!
Who is the biggest fraud?
P.S.
Let’s remind Meadows which party has committed fraud…
There was a time in American politics, and not that long ago, when it was considered embarrassing, even humiliating, to be caught in a lie. Now, those days exist only for Democrats.
If I read this article correctly (and I also will not listen to proven liars like Meadows), he is refuting what Trump clearly stated. That the object is to defund the Post Office to effect mail-in voting.
comment deleted.
It is impossible to overstate the stratospheric level of Meadows’ stupidity.
Don’t when, exactly, but Trump will fire both Meadows and DeJoy: probably Meadows first, and certainly by Oct 15; DeJoy may hang on longer, depending upon how “successful” Donald perceives his attack on USPS to be. But they’ll both go. And DeJoy, anyway, might very well find himself indicted after Jan 20.
Almost everyone of these Sabbathblathers has a Republican guest. Very few Democrats, minorities or women. Not representative of America.
Perhaps sooner if a state AG, NJ, for example, can build a case.
“There’s no evidence that there’s not either,” Meadows said. “That’s the definition of fraud, Jake.”
So I think that Meadows has been visiting Devin Nunes for some secret “side cow.”
My evidence? There is no evidence, but that’s because it is secret.
Quod Erat Demonstrandum.
Meadows is another in a long line of trump admin Goebbels wannabes.
I have heard these lying saboteurs say multiple times that fundamental operational changes at USPS are to improve “efficiency “. I have Yet to hear them be asked, let alone explain, precisely how the changes will impact speed, quality and cost—the measures that are at the core of increasing “efficiency “ in any operation. It’s like they’re saying I burned
down the factory to increase efficiency and the absurd assertion goes unchallenged. Instead they are asked why they are engaged in sabotage and they answer, we’re
Not; the changes are for efficiency. WTF?
No evidence is now evidence that fraud exist. Does someone have swampland on the market?
