It’s not bad work if you can get it. $500/hr or whatever it is to surf the web on your phone or read a book.
Lindsey Graham Will Testify This Week. What Do Prosecutors Want To Know? - TPM – Talking Points Memo
2 Likes
DoJ got a search warrant for those.
4 Likes
I think he was trying to impress his boss with his dedication.
3 Likes
Lindsey had best take the 5th on damn near every question. Too many have already testified. The prosecutors may already know the true answers to their questions for the senator.
Answer truthfully and implicate himself in one or more crimes, or lie and get charged with perjury.
5 Likes
They want to see if Lindsey is so far up Trump’s butt that you can no longer see his feet.
2 Likes
What Do Prosecutors Want To Know?
I can say with confidence that they do not want to know the contents of his little black book.
“All of them, Katie.”
3 Likes
So you folks think a sitting US Senator is going to invoke the section of the 5th Amendment allowing a defendant to plea that answering honestly might result in them admitting that they possibly? likely? committed a crime. I’m not an expert, but pleading the Fifth is not what sitting Senators do.
But in agreement with a comment above: Does Graham have his head so far up Donnie’s fat toochas that all he has left showing is the soles of his stinking shoes? Taking the unprecedented step of pleading the Fifth. Go Lindsay! You little man, you liar, you criminal, you low life.
2 Likes
It’s not what retired 3 star generals do either, yet there was mikey flynn fifthing away to the House Select Committee. Lindseymat can invoke the 5th and claim it was to avoid a perjury trap, and he might even be right.
5 Likes
The question there, the document reads, doesn’t only go to Graham himself and what he said, but to whether anyone directed him to ask Raffensperger to throw out the votes
That, right there, might be the question he is so desperately trying to avoid being asked.
2 Likes
And a full bottle of Brioschi as well to keep that upset stomach in check.
1 Like
It’s not a matter of great personal interest—I’d honestly prefer not to know anything, and forget what I already do—but I question Maher’s premise that an obese 76-year-old with every atrocious health habit it’s possible to have is necessarily “doing” anyone. It’s just a cheap laugh.
7 Likes
It’s all ok. Lindsey is a Jag Off himself.
2 Likes
Raffensperger has already testified so the honorable gentleman from South Carolina will have to be circumspect in his not necessarily “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth” answers.
3 Likes
- did iDJiT have anything to do with directing Graham to break the law to overturn Georgia?
- did anyone else conspire with Graham to break Georgia election law?
- did Graham say what Raffensperger says he said?
- who else was involved in the conspiracy?
- did Graham report back to iDJiT after the calls were made?
- did he report back to anyone after the calls were made?
“I don’t recall”
“I don’t recall”
“I don’t recall”
“I don’t recall”
“I don’t recall”
“I don’t recall”
“I don’t recall”
2 Likes
YA, but a good cheap laugh.
1 Like
$100 says all nine of those opinionators took their marching orders from Murdoch himself.
And that’s the only way that lovely front page happened. “FLORIDA MAN MAKES ANNOUNCEMENT” (Page 26???)
1 Like
“Candor” is an alien concept to the GQP.