Lin Wood Deletes Telegram Post That May Have Violated Court Order | Talking Points Memo

Lin Wood deleted a Telegram post on Monday that risked running afoul of a federal judge that he had already spent part of the day antagonizing.


This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://talkingpointsmemo.com/?p=1380947
1 Like

Stupid is supposed to hurt.

25 Likes

Sounds like a obvious violation.

19 Likes

Nail him! Nail him hard! Nail him hard til he screams!

10 Likes

From the roger stone school of stupid. Is he now going to post the judge’s home address?

39 Likes

Isn’t the cat already out of the bag – the internet never forgets – and thus the order already violated?

You can’t un-ring that bell.

30 Likes

He didn’t post the recording; he linked to someone else’s post of the recording.

7 Likes

I think Wood will burn like the toast he is.

11 Likes

“Release…the Hamster!!!”

26 Likes

Wood tried to distance himself from involvement in the lawsuit, saying that he hadn’t heard of it until reading about it in the paper.

His name is on the complaint.

At some point…somebody has got to advance to the real world…either the law against what these malingerers are doing is cited and enforced or they proceed to keep the lies and mayhem alive making a mockery of a profession that already has a long list of transgressions and challenges…

24 Likes

Please note here that the Law Profession seems to do a lousy job of policing itself by getting rid of fruitcakes and lunatic lawyers. Where are the State Boards that sanction bad lawyers and penalize them for mocking the process?

16 Likes

Lock. Him. Up!

23 Likes

say it again…

11 Likes

say it again

3 Likes

How did any of these KRAKEN Idiots ever get thru Law School? . . . ., Did they all go to Liberty University?

17 Likes

Is this the beginning of a lawyer joke?

4 Likes

14 Likes

So the judge ordered no recording of the hearing and he ‘innocently’ simply reposted a recording obtained from an unnamed source. That’s especially notable in a matter in which the judge is excoriating the lawyers for lack of diligence in vetting their ‘sources’ and the lawyers are claiming that their mere words should be afforded a presumption of correctness because, after all, they’re lawyers. .

It’s a little like being told not to eat the candy in the jar on the table and when you’re caught with the candy in your hand, pocket and mouth, you ‘innocently’ explain someone gave it to you.

40 Likes

Well put!

3 Likes

Wood is on a plane to someplace where he can start an apocalyptic cult in the jungle. He has no future here with any sort of legal profession.

11 Likes