Marcy Wheeler had a few useful posts on this.
I think this would be more an investigation of Bill Barr than Donald Trump at the end of the day. And, I think that investigation would be useful.
Marcy Wheeler had a few useful posts on this.
I think this would be more an investigation of Bill Barr than Donald Trump at the end of the day. And, I think that investigation would be useful.
Not sure why Judiciary would have a piece of this action, and certainly Durbin will not do anything about it.
But, there seems to be a legitimately serious question raised about someone running for Federal office, it should be looked into.
The only part that sounds dubious to me is that the Convicted Felon would put up his “own” money first before getting his bribe.
And as for the time it would take, how long did it take to investigate and convict Menendez? Shouldn’t be much different for Convicted Felon Trump.
And if it inconveniences him and costs “him” (campaign) time and money, it’s well worth the effort. I mean, it’s not like they’re really doing anything right now except campaigning.
Bullshit. As @txlawyer has said, upthread, there is not yet any LE confirmation of this story.
Bullshit again.
Let’s be clear: the story is very likely true. But the suggestion that “our guys and gals cant ]sic] be bothered to investigate” is horseshit. Or bullshit.
This.
It’s been known for four years.
All that is new now is that there was, in fact, a cash withdrawal from Egypt’s foreign currency reserves. DOJ investigators knew that, but it wasn’t in the public reporting until recently.
Narrator: No actions would ever be taken.
Since we know that Fat Boy will face no repercussions (nor shall Fat Barr), it seems reasonable to wonder as to why this should be investigated.
Personally, I would think this would be an investigation focused on the Trump Administration State Department and what they did for Egypt and Saudi Arabia (ie: working the cases backwards), but I’m sure that common sense approach violates some sacrosanct DoJ investigation memo that trumps the “moot” (per SCOTUS) Emoluments Clause of the Constitution.
That said, this is a Senate Judiciary committee investigation, so it seems like they could get a bit more effective with their methods if they were actually inclined to, I dunno, do something effective for once.
Citizen’s Untied.
You skipped cat shit. Horse and bull create good stuff, but think of all the poor cat women you ignore!
As long as John Roberts is Chief Justice of the Supreme Court this will go nowhere. Foreign countries have free speech rights and money is the same thing as free speech.
If a Democratic president so much as farts the GOP falls all over itself to investigate. If a Republican does many obvios crimes, Dems sit with their thumbs up their asses until the last possible second then make a token gesture more or less designed to fail.
This is the kind of inspiring leadership that got us to ~44% of the voting public preferring the criminal.
also from the story:
Per the story, it all began in the final days of the 2016 campaign. Trump, in some form, provided his campaign with $10 million of his own money.
First of all, TCF never provides anyone or anything any of “his own money.” It is always OPM (Other Peoples’ Money). So, it easy enough to ask what accounts were these monies transferred from? And second. This happened 9 years ago. What is the statute of limitations for this kind of criming?
Unfortunately, I see absolutely nothing coming from this from the Democratic leadership in the Senate, House, or Executive Branch. They just all want to go home. But, g-d forbid, with full pay, pensions, and any remaining budget for junket money.
Third: What’s Biden’s response/timeline looking like for his remaining 3-4 months?
Well, honestly, we’ll never “know” what or who the first guy was aiming for, and we sure as hell know the “second” guy NEVER FIRED A SHOT AT ANYONE near the golf course on that recent day… Let’s not get over our heads here. We’ll soon start looking like Tweedle-Dumb and Tweedle-Dee.
Thank all the forces of the four directions for Marcy Wheeler.
And where was it we have heard the name of Michael Sherwin before?
Of Course, Jan. 6th! For his work after the Electoral College Convention Insurrection that everyone wants to forget ----
I would truly love to see fat-ass Bill Barr, die Dudelsack spielt, on the hotseat. And would love to see Prosecutor Kamala Harris, introducing herself as Prosecutor “For the American People,” at his testimony.
Because Sisi is smart and wanted to see the receipts before he paid off TCF- he knows if it was in a different order, TCF would just pocket the cash. Doing it this way gives Sisi leverage over TCF to do what he wants him to (as he could drop a dime on the quid pro quo, if necessary).
Why bother?
The Senate Dems can’t be bothered looking into Thomas and Alito.
What the F ever with this story!
I’m sure the Dems in Congress will get right on it, after they wrap up their extensive and exhaustive investigation into Kushners’ $2B bung from MBS.
*And by “extensive and exhaustive” I mean sending one letter which was ignored, then giving up.
Strongly worded letters are the soup du jour in Congress (looking at you Dickhead Durbin).
Bribery is legal under the Constitution. It is free speech.
Dude, you’re not even trying.
Its the coverup that often gets people.
OFF-TOPIC
“The US will avoid a recession,” a majority of investors said.
Thanks, Joe Biden!!!
Change for the better. Vote the Democratic ticket.